CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233373
25 mars 2024
, have the national courts carried out in their decisions a sufficient examination and adequate balancing between the interests at stake with regard to the criteria set out and implemented by it in cases
Page 60 sur 819
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1206DEC001410688
6 décembre 1991
MARXER Mr. H.C.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0409JUD001985604
9 avril 2009
In the case of Kolesnichenko v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-178253
5 octobre 2017
The circumstances of the case 2. The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1. Background 3.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0825DEC002327404
25 août 2005
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1124DEC000497214
24 novembre 2015
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0529JUD002860202
29 mai 2008
In the case of Maruseva v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD006475209
24 mai 2016
open a criminal case ... 5.
ECLI:CEDH:001-109955
16 janvier 2012
The Regional Inspector found, on the basis of the documentary evidence gathered in the case, that the flooding of the applicant’s property had resulted both from the road works carried out in the applicant
ECLI:CEDH:001-188046
8 novembre 2018
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0217DEC007109901
17 février 2004
A study was carried out in the applicant’s home on 8 June 2000.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0828DEC000750805
28 août 2008
I declare that this constitutes a final resolution of the case.”
ECLI:CEDH:001-210454
17 mai 2021
2020/326 E., K. 2020/338 K. dated 11 March 2020; and the decision of the İzmir Regional Administrative Court, no. 2020/602 E., 2020/883 K. dated 7 July 2020)?
ECLI:CEDH:001-153957
27 mars 2015
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12636
24 octobre 2019
In the circumstances of the applicants’ cases – where the alleged discrimination was on the basis of disability and gender, and had not resulted from a transitional measure carried out in good faith in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0427JUD002565194
27 avril 2000
the circumstances of the case 12.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0922JUD000079607
22 septembre 2020
In the context of that case the first applicant was charged with aggravated murder and put on a wanted list on 29 March 2004.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013JUD002787203
13 octobre 2009
In the case of Gasyak and Others v.
civ3
6137233acd580146774071c4
23 juin 1999
Baechlin, avocat général, et après en avoir délibéré conformément à la loi ; Sur le moyen unique : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Aix-en-Provence, 7 mai 1997), que les époux X... ayant par marché
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0902DEC002115593
2 septembre 1994
MARXER B.