OMNIUM DE GESTION ET DE FINANCEMENT [Adresse 4] [Localité 6] Représentée par Me Nicolas FALQUE, avocat au barreau de MARSEILLE INTIMEE : Madame [B] [F] de nationalité Française [Adresse

They maintained that the land was private property belonging to the State with the twofold effect that the usual rules governing acquisition by adverse possession under private law were applicable to their

  On 24 May 1999 Mr Nicolae Văcăroiu (N.V.), the Vice-president of the Social Democratic Party, former Prime Minister, Vice-president of the Senate at the material time and later President of the

Kūris ,     Sir   Nicolas Bratza ,   Mrs   H.S. Greve ,   Mr   M. Ugrekhelidze , judges , and     Mrs   S.

  The applicant further complains about the assessment of evidence in the civil court proceedings, that he was deprived of his property and that his right to respect for his private and family life

  The applicant submitted that in late 1998 and early 1999 he had been approached by AZ, a person previously unknown to him, through VS, a private acquaintance.

no. 36498/05)     TIME-LIMIT FOR JUDICIAL RECOGNITION OF PATERNITY SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED AUTOMATICALLY   Unanimously in both cases   Violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private

Application no. 26550/10 by D.B.N. against the United Kingdom The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 31 May 2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Lech Garlicki, President,   Nicolas

Araci , Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 13 November 2007, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to respect for private and family life) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Makarczyk ,   Sir   Nicolas Bratza,   Mr   V. Butkevych ,   Mr   J. Hedigan ,   Mr   M. Pellonpää , judges, and   Mr   V.

Aracı , Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 3 July 2007, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1.

,   Giovanni Bonello,   Riza Türmen,   Kristaq Traja,   Stanislav Pavlovschi,   Ján Šikuta, judges, and Fatoş Aracı, Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on

Lastly, he submitted that his various criminal complaints against private individuals, prosecutors, police officers and prison guards had not been examined properly and promptly.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 17 June 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 2 September 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Elens-Passos , Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 7 September 2004, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 3 June 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nicolas Bratza, President,   Lech Garlicki,   Giovanni Bonello,   Ljiljana Mijović,