On 11 March 2011 the applicant submitted a complaint to the prosecutor of the Krasnoyarsk region about his unlawful detention and the police’s failure to inform him about the reasons for

    The Government argued that having obtained a partly favourable court decision relating to the legality of the police’s actions on 31 January 2009 (see paragraphs 23-25 above), the applicant

Petteri Aittola Juha Alajoki Jussi Jaakko Alanko Reijo Juhani Alanne Jouko Ala-Poikela Jari Alari Kari Alari Jorma Alatalo Tuomo Ali-Vehmas Rauno Tapio Almi Jari Kalevi Andersson Simo Heikki Antikainen

Shortly thereafter, Mr Goran Miletić met with the police’s representatives who informed him that the police had collected information that hooligans were planning to cause unrest in various parts of Belgrade

Such shortcomings – which included the police’s persistent failure to take basic steps and their unwillingness to cooperate with investigative committee , and the investigators’ persistent failure to comply

requirement of prior notification to the authorities, served the legitimate aims of ensuring public safety, protecting the rights of others and preventing disorder, the latter aspect also covering the police’s

According to the Custody Image Review, the police’s ability to make use of custody images is enhanced by their ability to upload them from forces’ local custody IT systems onto the Police National Database

The seized documents remained in the police's possession. 9.

The court had   unsuccessfully attempted to summon him to appear at the main hearing, but the police’s efforts to   locate him had been in vain.

    According to the police’s mission statement and the report of the operation, the police officers had been equipped with firearms and tear gas and had used them in self-defence. 25.

agree with the opinion of the majority that there has been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention, for the following reasons: The case concerns the delicate and difficult issue of evaluating the police's

    On 12 April 2013 I.M., an officer from the Professional Conduct Department of the Zadar police interviewed officer M.K., a guard from the police’s detention facility.

As a result, the trespass to the applicant and her mother's goods and home was a "highly probable or very likely consequence" of the police's negligence.   42.

Lord Justice Ward commented that the shoddy detective work did not justify a finding in the police’s favour and that the case caused him concern.

on 23/03/2021; Specific defects: no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s

A police superintendent also gave evidence as to the police’s enquiries into Mr Pearman.

Testimony of policeman."        With regard to the applicant        "Possession of part of the robbed items.

[but] he was not transferred to a detention facility until 1 a.m. on 23 March, remaining in the premises of the Riga police station ( Rīgas rajona policijas pārvalde )...

Accordingly, neither the applicant nor his counsel ever had an adequate opportunity to examine witnesses whose evidence, which had been taken in their absence and later reported by a policeman who had