CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 954 résultats pour « Samir Lassoued »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0121JUD004577199

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2003

21 janvier 2003

They all contained the elements of the same offence – they were directed against the State taxation system, had the same criminal consequences, were all committed intentionally and in a similar fashion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD002126206

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2014

26 juin 2014

On the same day the first-instance court rejected the request as unfounded.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1014JUD002845108

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2014

14 octobre 2014

On the same day, he was asked to identify the guns allegedly used in the incident. He was also asked to identify two other people who had been arrested in connection with the same robbery.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD000030205

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2009

20 janvier 2009

They thus lasted almost seven years and five months (seven years, four months and twenty-six days) at three levels of jurisdiction. 37.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1026DEC005251699

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2004

26 octobre 2004

The applicant further contends under the same heading that the civil proceedings in question were not concluded within a “reasonable time”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0410DEC002789195

Admin. suprême

10 avril 1997

10 avril 1997

   The applicant also complains that his detention remand lasted unreasonably long.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0531JUD003421502

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2007

31 mai 2007

On the same day, the Skopje Municipal Court ( Општински Суд Скопје) dismissed the applicant's claims. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0408JUD006472501

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2008

8 avril 2008

    On various dates the aforementioned cases were joined under the same case file before the Ezine Cadastral Court. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0706JUD004122802

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2006

6 juillet 2006

Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214JUD002215004

Admin. suprême

14 février 2012

14 février 2012

Several police officers and two other detainees were in the same vehicle.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0925JUD006734110

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2012

25 septembre 2012

Another hearing scheduled for 6 July 2010 was adjourned for the same reason. 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD000305206

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2011

21 juin 2011

    On the same day, the applicant lodged an appeal with the Appellate Division of the Federal Criminal Court. 23.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0224JUD003390804

Admin. suprême

24 février 2011

24 février 2011

  33908/04, 7937/05, 25249/05, 29402/05 and 33571/06 is identical and they were submitted by the same applicant company.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1006REP001122484

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 1987

6 octobre 1987

  On the same date the Commission adopted the text of the Report.   14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904DEC005085306

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2018

4 septembre 2018

At the same time, reference was made to regulation no. 61 (see Ņikitina v.   Latvia (dec.) no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0726JUD005954912

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2018

26 juillet 2018

    On that same day, R.K. was admitted to a women’s shelter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD000252709

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2014

16 octobre 2014

At the same time, at about 5.30 p.m. mortar shelling of the nearby area began. I don’t know who opened fire.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC002932895

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 1997

2 juillet 1997

The cell doors were kept open for about one hour per day; the daily exercise also lasted about one hour; and twice a week the prisoners could spent one hour in the room for leisure activities.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0522DEC001760307

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2012

22 mai 2012

The Federal Court of Justice also stressed that the main proceedings before the Regional Court had lasted very long.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13098

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2021

19 janvier 2021

(c) Whether there were sufficient counterbalancing factors to compensate for the handicaps under which the defence laboured –   The Court of Appeal, in its judgment, had given neither any indication

Source officielle

Page 61 sur 348

← PrécédentSuivant →