CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

135 322 résultats pour « Theis »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD002535812

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2017

24 janvier 2017

    On 1 August 2011 the second applicant and the child underwent DNA testing. The result of these tests showed that there was no genetic link between them. 31.

Page 61 sur 6767

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0309DEC001239986

Admin. suprême

9 mars 1988

9 mars 1988

  They allege that their requests to the local authority to see the child have been refused.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0324JUD003558508

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2020

24 mars 2020

One of them brought the second and third applicants to the doctor in the neighbouring village. They were transported to a hospital in Gudermes and then on to Grozny. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127JUD002410907

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2015

27 janvier 2015

When we went to the Trabzon Medico-Surgical and Obstetrics Centre, doctor K.B. told us that there were no places available and that they could not take the child into their care.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0220JUD001188985

Admin. suprême

20 février 1991

20 février 1991

On 4 June 1984 they filed their supplementary pleadings, and on 18 June these were served on the respondent, who replied on 2 November 1984.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0619JUD003653397

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2001

19 juin 2001

This followed from the fact that the Court of Appeal expressly linked the resolution of the disclosure and fresh evidence issues, and then decided that there was nothing in the fresh evidence which rendered

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0315JUD003229305

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2011

15 mars 2011

They had attempted to arrest him for this behaviour, but he had resisted, using violence against them; then O.B. had arrived and tried to stop the policemen from restraining V.I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD005002708

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2014

24 juin 2014

They considered that neither at the time of their arrest, nor subsequently, were there any grounds to suspect them of having committed a specific criminal offence, and that the sole reason for their arrest

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330DEC002816302

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2006

30 mars 2006

They alleged under Article 8 of the Convention that their right to respect for their family life and home had been violated since they were unable to return to their village.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0312DEC001686510

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2013

12 mars 2013

The mass movement of Turkish Cypriots and the abandonment by them of their properties in areas which were controlled by the Republic of Cyprus gave rise to a need to protect these properties for their

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD004008114

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2015

15 octobre 2015

The applicants all stated in court that they feared for their lives if returned to Syria and referred to information about the ongoing and widespread conflict there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD001172404

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2007

6 décembre 2007

They allege that the Court of Cassation granted this request on the ground that the summons in question had been served on them only on 17 June 2003.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD001070004

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2009

22 janvier 2009

There they saw a Russian soldier holding the knife which had been taken away by the abductors of their relatives. The applicants recognised the knife by its shape and the black handle.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0603DEC000023216

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2025

3 juin 2025

At the end of their apology the court asked the parties whether they wished to obtain any additional examinations or clarifications, to which they replied in the negative and the president of the court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233074

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2024

12 mars 2024

The situation was not only very damaging for the people placed in that accommodation, especially the longer they were there, but it was also bad for the Home Office and the Treasury. 30.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0126DEC002824302

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2006

26 janvier 2006

The first applicant, his wife and their (then) five children left Turkey in 1989. They unsuccessfully applied for asylum in Germany.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2016

30 mars 2016

By this time Mr   de   Menezes was already in the underground station. Trojan 84 relayed the order to the SFOs, informing them that “they want us to stop the subject getting on the tube”.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1305620-1361790

Admin. suprême

7 avril 2005

7 avril 2005

  The Court noted in these two cases that the courts of appeal concerned had dismissed the applicants’ claims for compensation on the sole ground that, when they were placed in detention, there had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD002205105

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2021

29 juin 2021

They then nailed the doors shut from the inside using nail guns and blocked them with office furniture.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212DEC005155509

Admin. suprême

12 février 2013

12 février 2013

The three oldest boys D, E and F, together with their step-brother C, continued their placement in the same foster home which was best for them taking into account their special needs.

Source officielle