CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD002535812
24 janvier 2017
On 1 August 2011 the second applicant and the child underwent DNA testing. The result of these tests showed that there was no genetic link between them. 31.
Page 61 sur 6767
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0309DEC001239986
9 mars 1988
They allege that their requests to the local authority to see the child have been refused.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0324JUD003558508
24 mars 2020
One of them brought the second and third applicants to the doctor in the neighbouring village. They were transported to a hospital in Gudermes and then on to Grozny. 11.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127JUD002410907
27 janvier 2015
When we went to the Trabzon Medico-Surgical and Obstetrics Centre, doctor K.B. told us that there were no places available and that they could not take the child into their care.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0220JUD001188985
20 février 1991
On 4 June 1984 they filed their supplementary pleadings, and on 18 June these were served on the respondent, who replied on 2 November 1984.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0619JUD003653397
19 juin 2001
This followed from the fact that the Court of Appeal expressly linked the resolution of the disclosure and fresh evidence issues, and then decided that there was nothing in the fresh evidence which rendered
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0315JUD003229305
15 mars 2011
They had attempted to arrest him for this behaviour, but he had resisted, using violence against them; then O.B. had arrived and tried to stop the policemen from restraining V.I.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0624JUD005002708
24 juin 2014
They considered that neither at the time of their arrest, nor subsequently, were there any grounds to suspect them of having committed a specific criminal offence, and that the sole reason for their arrest
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330DEC002816302
30 mars 2006
They alleged under Article 8 of the Convention that their right to respect for their family life and home had been violated since they were unable to return to their village.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0312DEC001686510
12 mars 2013
The mass movement of Turkish Cypriots and the abandonment by them of their properties in areas which were controlled by the Republic of Cyprus gave rise to a need to protect these properties for their
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1015JUD004008114
15 octobre 2015
The applicants all stated in court that they feared for their lives if returned to Syria and referred to information about the ongoing and widespread conflict there.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD001172404
6 décembre 2007
They allege that the Court of Cassation granted this request on the ground that the summons in question had been served on them only on 17 June 2003.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0122JUD001070004
22 janvier 2009
There they saw a Russian soldier holding the knife which had been taken away by the abductors of their relatives. The applicants recognised the knife by its shape and the black handle.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0603DEC000023216
3 juin 2025
At the end of their apology the court asked the parties whether they wished to obtain any additional examinations or clarifications, to which they replied in the negative and the president of the court
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233074
12 mars 2024
The situation was not only very damaging for the people placed in that accommodation, especially the longer they were there, but it was also bad for the Home Office and the Treasury. 30.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0126DEC002824302
26 janvier 2006
The first applicant, his wife and their (then) five children left Turkey in 1989. They unsuccessfully applied for asylum in Germany.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0330JUD000587808
30 mars 2016
By this time Mr de Menezes was already in the underground station. Trojan 84 relayed the order to the SFOs, informing them that “they want us to stop the subject getting on the tube”.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1305620-1361790
7 avril 2005
The Court noted in these two cases that the courts of appeal concerned had dismissed the applicants’ claims for compensation on the sole ground that, when they were placed in detention, there had
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD002205105
29 juin 2021
They then nailed the doors shut from the inside using nail guns and blocked them with office furniture.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212DEC005155509
12 février 2013
The three oldest boys D, E and F, together with their step-brother C, continued their placement in the same foster home which was best for them taking into account their special needs.