AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, DEUXIEME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur les pourvois n A 93-12.769 et n B 93-12.770 formés par la société Limoges Castel, dont le siège

They all affirmed that they had no idea what had caused Önder Babat’s injuries. 10.     On 4 March 2004 at 11.30 a.m.

In the case of Fyodorov and Fyodorova v.

    It is not disputed that the domestic courts in the criminal proceedings against the applicant in the present case acknowledged that the search of his car had been carried out in breach of

  Particular circumstances of the case           The applicant was the owner of a property called Slätvaren 42 at Limhamn in the municipality of Malmö.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

batons carried a symbolic meaning for the march and had had no idea that they would be used as weapons against the police. 15 .

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.

Jean-Marc, partie civile, contre l'arrêt de la cour d'appel de PARIS, 11ème chambre, en date du 12 décembre 2002, qui, dans la procédure suivie contre Mickaële Y..., pour dénonciation calomnieuse, a

    On 5 March 2014 notice of the application was given to the Government. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

In the present case, after the completion of the criminal investigation on 26 March 2009 with the Tarsus Assize Court’s rejection of the objection lodged by the applicants (see paragraph 28 above), the

    On 2 March 2012 criminal case no. 11600041 was joined to two other criminal cases, nos.   11600061 and 116000050, on the abduction of two other people in the same region.

In the case of Alpeyeva and Dzhalagoniya v.

nul et dépourvu de cause réelle et sérieuse, en invitant les parties à s'expliquer sur l'incidence d'une mesure d'interdiction de jeux dont le salarié avait fait l'objet ; Attendu que la société Casino

In the case of Pârvu v.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

As it transpires from the hearing records in the case-file, at the hearing on 18 March 2008 the court heard police officer C.T., who had effected the applicant’s arrest.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. The applicant was a customs officer.

    On 17 December 2009 the Argeş County Court decided to send the case back to the prosecutor’s office, because the applicant’s complaint about the prosecutor’s decision of 3 March 2009 had