Kruschev during his visit to Britain in the 1950s, and were guilty of routine burglary and bugging (including the entering of Russian consulates abroad).

  Kruschev during his visit to Britain in the 1950s, and were guilty of routine burglary and bugging (including the entering of Russian consulates abroad).

The case originated in an application (no. 8691/79) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission on 19 July 1979 under Article 25 (art. 25) by a United Kingdom

J.G. met the applicant and M.K. in Munich and Stuttgart, where they told him about a new drug transfer from Croatia to Great Britain. He was again given instructions by M.K. using the mobile phone.

In Britain, it was common to perform several sections and then advise the mother either to be sterilised or to use artificial contraception. This was not an option in Ireland.

In Britain, it was common to perform several sections and then advise the mother either to be sterilised or to use artificial contraception. This was not an option in Ireland.

In Britain, it was common to perform several sections and then advise the mother either to be sterilised or to use artificial contraception. This was not an option in Ireland. 56.

    The case originated in an application (no. 31045/10) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

The case originated in an application (no. 9063/80) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Commission in January 1980 under Article 25 (art. 25) by Joseph and

In Britain, it was common to perform several sections and then advise the mother either to be sterilised or to use artificial contraception. This was not an option in Ireland.

    The case originated in an application (no. 47335/06) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

  She was clearly not a member of the Communist Party of Great Britain.   However she was legal officer for NCCL which had been assessed as a subversive organisation.

xa0;  The case was brought before the Court on 25 January 1989 by the European Commission of Human Rights ("the Commission"), on 30 January 1989 by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain

    The case originated in an application (no. 19840/09) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

  46692/19) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

    The case originated in two applications (nos. 65731/01 and 65900/01) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention

  Kruschev during his visit to Britain in the 1950s, and were guilty of routine burglary and bugging (including the entering of Russian consulates abroad).

    The case originated in an application (no. 61498/08) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

    The case originated in five applications (nos. 24027/07, 11949/08 36742/08, 66911/09 and 67354/09) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under