Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
2ème chambre
DCA_21PA04204_20220921
21 septembre 2022
21 septembre 2022
DECIDE : Article 1er : La requête de la société Hellier du Verneuil est rejetée.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1321602-1389900
28 avril 2005
28 avril 2005
The Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1680077-1769062
30 mai 2006
30 mai 2006
Mr Borowik was held in police custody on 27 and 28 June 1995. The company’s premises were searched.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1824544-1925265
2 novembre 2006
2 novembre 2006
It therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2130515-2273653
4 octobre 2007
4 octobre 2007
Accordingly, the Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1254201-1314567
8 février 2005
8 février 2005
Consequently, it held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 5 § 1 on that account either.
Source officielle3e chambre - formation à 3
DCA_24DA02011_20260210
10 février 2026
10 février 2026
des agents territoriaux actifs et retraités de la commune d’Avesnes-sur-Helpe.
Source officielle6ème Chambre
6793332232b173f45a7c8d53
23 janvier 2025
23 janvier 2025
société Helios Fiducie et/ou M.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1830674-1920788
7 novembre 2006
7 novembre 2006
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-576983-579958
25 juin 2002
25 juin 2002
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-588335-592187
15 juillet 2002
15 juillet 2002
The Court therefore held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 13.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0925DEC003726197
25 septembre 2001
25 septembre 2001
Following a change of the competent judge a further hearing was held on 2 May 1995 where the expert was present and orally explained his opinion.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68300-68768
17 octobre 2000
17 octobre 2000
They complained that they were ill-treated by police both at the time of their arrest and while being held in police custody, in violation of Article 3 (prohibition of torture and degrading treatment or
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68219-68687
2 mai 2000
2 mai 2000
A hearing was held on 25 January 2000.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1187128-1232785
10 novembre 2004
10 novembre 2004
The Court held unanimously: that there had been a violation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to a fair trial; that the violation found was the result of a structural
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1188119-1233984
10 novembre 2004
10 novembre 2004
It accordingly held unanimously that there had been violations of Article 10 of the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;GCREFERRALS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1802228-1890532
29 septembre 2006
29 septembre 2006
In its Chamber judgment of 25 April 2006 (press release No. 234 , 2006) the Court held, by four votes to three, that there had been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-550602-552400
14 mai 2002
14 mai 2002
The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (right to a fair hearing within a reasonable time)
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1579801-1658570
9 février 2006
9 février 2006
It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2202329-2354013
6 décembre 2007
6 décembre 2007
The Court held, by six votes to one: that there had been no violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning the applicant
Source officiellePage 63 sur 2440