MOTIFS : La société intimée soutient que l'appel est irrecevable comme tardif dès lors que le courrier recommandé contenant la déclaration d'appel de Mme [S] a été reçu au greffe de la cour le 5 mars

  In 1999 Durres District Court convicted the applicant of five counts of murder, two counts of attempted murder, one count of possession of military arms and one count of creating and participating

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 March 2002. # Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic. # Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Community own resources - Import

the court room”.

QUE L'ARRET DE LA COUR DE GRENOBLE A ETE ANNULE PAR UNE DECISION, EN DATE DU 23 MAI 1975, DE LA 3.

Ordonnance de la Cour (septième chambre) du 19 mars 2019.#Michal Harvilik – HYDRA contre République tchèque et Cour européenne des droits de l'homme.

although his conviction on other counts stood.

    On 16 January 2002 the Warsaw District Court convicted the applicant of several counts of robbery and extortion committed in an organised criminal group.

  A.V. -   was convicted on 21 February 1997 by Vienna Regional Criminal Court under Article 209 of homosexual acts with adolescents, and on one minor count of misappropriation.

Law – Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (d): The Court applied a combination of the two sets of principles developed in the Court’s case-law regarding admission of evidence of witnesses absent from a trial and the

This argument was examined and rejected by the investigating judge, the Regional Court and the Court of Appeal, successively.

On learning in the course of the civil action that parts of the diary had been submitted to the Supreme Court, the applicant unsuccessfully requested the Regional Court of Korneuburg on 22 January 1986

Maître X a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 30 mai 2016, à la suite du refus opposé par le garde des sceaux, ministre de la justice

The applicant and his lawyer appealed to the Kyiv Regional Court of Appeal, stating that the first-instance court’s findings had not been supported by sufficient evidence and that that court had incorrectly

Ont été entendus au cours de l’audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Cerf, - les conclusions de M.

court’s decision in respect of a future request concerning new circumstances.

The Court’s judgment Following the dismissal of the applicant’s appeal, an application was introduced with this Court and, in its judgment of 24 June 2003, the Court found that there had been a violation

On the basis of the Amended Act on Assemblies the Mayor of Warsaw banned the counter ‑ demonstration and the courts upheld his decision. 6.

-10.1 Le courtier-mandataire souhaitant cesser son activité ou céder une partie de celle-ci doit en informer [la FDJ] par courrier recommandé avec demande d'avis de réception, avec un préavis d'au moins

    Recent case-law of the Federal Constitutional Court (a)     The Federal Constitutional Court’s leading judgment on preventive detention of 4 May 2011 On 4 May 2011 the Federal Constitutional