CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 577 résultats pour « Policella »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0217JUD004160411

Admin. suprême

17 février 2015

17 février 2015

There is no other set of facts which could have constituted the basis for the police’s decision to impose the second driving ban.

Page 64 sur 79

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD001700620

Admin. suprême

26 août 2025

26 août 2025

In its email of 3   February 2020, the State Prosecutor replied that its review of the case had not been confined to the police’s classification of the alleged offences.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0503DEC004138006

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2011

3 mai 2011

In this regard, it had admitted that the judge advocate had not drawn the police’s attention to the probability of violent acts occurring at the hearing of the case so that the appropriate security measures

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0914JUD004041919

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2021

14 septembre 2021

They had found that in civil proceedings, the courts were not bound by the police’s decision declining to institute a criminal investigation on the plaintiff’s report.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0203JUD005718517

Admin. suprême

3 février 2026

3 février 2026

their liberty in a deceptive way Art 5 § 2 • Information in language understood • Authorities engaged the services of an interpreter at the police station following the applicants’ arrest Art 5 § 4 • Police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0303DEC005969600

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2005

3 mars 2005

However, the police operation in question was planned and carried out, without the police's having any incriminating information about the applicant; on the contrary, he had had no criminal record and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD003508204

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2007

26 juillet 2007

The District Court also stated – without specifying the reasons for that finding – that the terrorist threat had been not merely potential but a real one which justified the police's forcible actions in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0514DEC001518910

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2013

14 mai 2013

    From 16 April 1976 to 30 May 1999 the applicant was a functionary of the Civic Militia and, after having been positively vetted in 1990, of the Police ( Policja ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1201JUD004671215

Admin. suprême

1 décembre 2020

1 décembre 2020

The court noted that the applicant had failed to comply with the three-month statutory time-limit for appealing against the police’s actions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208738

Admin. suprême

19 février 2021

19 février 2021

However, it seems to me that those points were in essence the same as the ones that persuaded [the first-instance judge] that the [police’s] decision was proportionate on the facts of this case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0423JUD001649909

Admin. suprême

23 avril 2015

23 avril 2015

exact day of the applicant’s arrest, it was stated that according to non-official information obtained during the search the applicant had been arrested by the OCD, which had failed to reply to the police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD005981319

Admin. suprême

26 août 2025

26 août 2025

However, the State Prosecutor invalidated the police’s decision in respect of the alleged threat and ordered that prosecution be initiated under Article   233 of the GPC. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0704JUD000762119

Admin. suprême

4 juillet 2024

4 juillet 2024

Her specific complaints were about: (a) the police’s failure to protect her daughter from domestic violence while she was still alive, and (b) their failure to conduct an effective criminal investigation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0516JUD003474916

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2024

16 mai 2024

organising banned demonstrations – and in placing him under a residence restriction on that ground for a period corresponding to that of COP21, a period during which he intended to concentrate the police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0113DEC005435320

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2026

13 janvier 2026

The claim arose from the police’s dissemination to third parties of a demand for information issued in a pending criminal investigation.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229228

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2023

2 novembre 2023

on 23/03/2021; Specific defects: no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1215JUD005415111

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2022

15 décembre 2022

It has previously held that the police’s failure to conduct a search immediately following an arrest without good reason raises legitimate concerns about the possible “planting” of evidence (see Layijov

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD003922903

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2011

7 juillet 2011

Likewise the medical assessment had verified the police’s version of events only.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1113JUD003996402

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2008

13 novembre 2008

their grand-daughter and the first applicant’s mother; about the allegedly unlawful arrest of the first applicant by police in 2005 and about the placement of the first applicant’s photograph on the police’s

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0310JUD000437802

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2009

10 mars 2009

    On 3 October 2000 V., acting on the police's instructions, came to see the applicant at his estate.

Source officielle