inline-block } .s47BA2785 { width:188.77pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 10547/06 Mikheil CHKHEIDZE against Georgia The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting

inline-block } .sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 43945/06 Janja PETRINJA POROPAT against Slovenia The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

.sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 46664/10 Stepan SAHAKYAN against Armenia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

DECISION Applications nos. 45302/16 and 11061/17 Nikita Nikolayevich OSTAPKO against Russia and Dmitriy Vasilyevich MANYUK against Russia   The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting

page-break-after:avoid } .s48E1953 { width:187.27pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 5167/07 by Jože KAVŠEK against Slovenia The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

sA2E62387 { width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }   FIFTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 40614/10 Sergey Bernardovich RYL against Ukraine The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

width:204.97pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 67441/13 Mindaugas BARTAŠEVIČIUS against Lithuania The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting

width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIFTH SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 14374/03 by Hartmut WEISERT against Germany The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting

233.81pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION PARTIAL DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 61595/00 by Mehmet CETINKAYA against Austria The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

They were brought before a magistrate (sitting in the Court of Magistrates as a Court of Criminal Inquiry) and remanded in custody.

, avocat au barreau de PARIS, toque : J083 Me [B] [L] - Administrateur judiciaire de la Société CV BAT [Adresse 4] [Localité 7] Représenté par Me Géraldine SITTINGER, avocat au barreau de PARIS

    On 6 January 1997 the court, sitting in camera , decided to obtain an expert opinion. On 15 February 1997 an expert prepared the opinion.

Between 16 April and 16 September 2009 the panel, sitting in private, extended the detention order on several occasions for the same reasons as described above.

    On 13 April 2018 the Zalău District Court (“the first-instance court”), sitting as a single judge, heard oral evidence from the applicant.

    On 8 January 2021 the Supreme Court, sitting in a bench composed of judges E.P., S.   S., and I.   P., gave an interlocutory decision rejecting the request.

inline-block } FIRST SECTION   DECISION   AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF   Application no. 39024/97 by L.N. against the Netherlands     The European Court of Human Rights (First Section) sitting

sA8847899 { width:93.07pt; display:inline-block }     FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 46622/21 Ádám NÉMETH against Hungary   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting

    At around midnight on 10 November 1996 the first applicant’s son and the remaining two applicants’ brother 18-year old Uğur Tercan was sitting in a parked car in Istanbul together with three

On 10 April 2008 the Dessau-Roßlau Administrative Court, sitting as a chamber composed of three judges, granted the legal aid request on the ground that it was doubtful whether the order had been lawful

    On 31 March 2011 the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court, sitting as a full bench, adopted a resolution (III CZP 112/10).