CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1126JUD003321896
26 novembre 2002
The applicants alleged that the local authority had failed to protect them from abuse by their stepfather and that they had no remedy in this respect.
Page 65 sur 6767
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0326JUD002922922
26 mars 2026
Nor is there any indication that the injuries in question were self‑inflicted or that they had been caused between the time of the applicants’ release and their examination by a doctor.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0828JUD001715311
28 août 2012
or specified their requests; (ii) some of their representatives had had dubious standing to represent them; (iii) there had been a lack of State funds which could be used for this purpose; and (iv) in
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11618
6 avril 2017
Between 2007 and 2009 they applied to the domestic courts to have amended the entries on their birth certificates indicating their sex and first names.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7102
11 octobre 2001
These cases concern the refusal of the courts to grant the applicants a right of access to their respective children, born out of wedlock.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0413DEC001300487
13 avril 1989
They also allege that the evidence against them was provided almost entirely by an accomplice Joseph Charles Bennett, who had been given immunity from prosecution by the Crown and this also deprived
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215JUD001146802
15 février 2007
They complained that during their detention they were never brought before a judge, which deprived them of the possibility of effectively arguing for their release pending trial. 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0712JUD004113898
12 juillet 2005
A police car had even pursued the applicant and other Roma trying to return to their homes, firing shots at them and shouting at them to leave the village.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0926DEC003767497
26 septembre 2000
They contend that “goodwill” is the value of their businesses based upon the profits generated by those businesses, and distinguish this from future profits per se, which they do not claim.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0701DEC005548000
1 juillet 2003
They allege that this interference with their Convention rights was not “prescribed by law” within the meaning of Article 10 § 2 of the Convention.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155549
29 mai 2015
However, they submitted that even if they conferred exactly the same rights, it still would not be compatible with the right to equal treatment and amount to segregation that there were two different legal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0311DEC006044113
11 mars 2014
These names matched those given by the other witness above. The militia member who had told the witness this had passed away meanwhile.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0828JUD001705406
28 août 2018
Then they had grabbed him and forced into one of their vehicles.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13111
2 février 2021
authorities had had doubts as to the credibility of the applicants’ allegations, they could have attempted to clarify the facts by requesting to interview the applicants and their parents.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1022DEC002401112
22 octobre 2019
In their statements to the public prosecutor, the applicants, assisted by their lawyers, denied the veracity of the charges against them.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1980:1106JUD000736776
6 novembre 1980
They claimed (a) the allocation of a suitable house to each of them; (b) permanent access to Cala Reale by members of their families; (c) work opportunities capable of providing maintenance for them and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0703JUD001270302
3 juillet 2008
The servicemen tied the men's hands behind their backs with metal wire and pulled their caps over their faces. They also recorded these actions with a video camera. 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0310DEC006085500
10 mars 2005
In July 1999, some persons wearing the KLA uniform went into the applicants' neighbourhood, entered their house, pointed their guns at them and threatened to kill them if they did not leave their house
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710JUD000457007
10 juillet 2012
The court established that the facts concerning the migrants’ journey and the sequence of events after they had entered the respondent State were as they had described in their written statements of 2
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0907DEC004052198
7 septembre 2000
The Board had been informed by the then expert at the Mental Health Care Office that there was no such fresh information which would warrant a revised opinion on the mother’s state of health.