CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-128177
17 octobre 2013
no. 17323/07 Slavka LAKIĆEVIĆ against Montenegro and 7 other applications (see list appended) STATEMENT OF FACTS The seven applicants in the present cases lodged eight applications (the sixth applicant
Page 65 sur 1989
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0529DEC005275216
29 mai 2018
In these circumstances the Court concludes that it is no longer justified to continue the examination of the application within the meaning of Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention.
ECLI:CEDH:001-126714
2 septembre 2013
The State secured the applicant’s conviction in a criminal case on the strength of the evidence obtained in breach of the prohibition laid down by Article 3 of the Convention.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1983:0224JUD000752576
24 février 1983
on the application in the present case of Article 50 (art. 50) of the Convention: PROCEDURE AND FACTS 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906DEC003837420
6 septembre 2022
individual application as provided for in the Convention and that impedes the proper functioning of the Court or the proper conduct of the proceedings before it (see Miroļubovs and Others v.
ECLI:CEDH:001-146930
10 septembre 2014
He also claims, in this connection, that he did not have an effective remedy under Article 13 of the Convention. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1016DEC006881116
16 octobre 2018
forth in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.
ECLI:CEDH:001-222472
12 décembre 2022
In his application, Narek Sardaryan complains, inter alia, of being severely beaten in a systematic manner on different part of his body using different types of instruments such as heavy clubs; of a heated
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC003615797
6 juillet 1999
The applicant specified that this evidence would be used in the Convention proceedings.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-98285
7 décembre 2006
11 (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention”); Deeply deploring the fact that, to date, Turkey has still not complied with its obligations to pay to the applicant the sums awarded in respect
ECLI:CEDH:001-238334
7 novembre 2024
Did the applicant have at his disposal an effective remedy for his complaint under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention? 2.
ECLI:CEDH:001-237327
12 septembre 2024
The applicant complained that the order expelling him from Denmark was in violation of Article 8 of the Convention. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
ECLI:CEDH:001-215569
13 janvier 2022
Was Article 6 of the Convention applicable to the proceedings in the present case under its civil or criminal head (see Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1202DEC001269918
2 décembre 2021
The applicant submitted various applications regarding the investigation, requesting, inter alia , the reclassification of the offence into violence. 3.
Pôle 6 - Chambre 2
69e1c748cdc6046d4788f69d
16 avril 2026
[L] a été embauché, dans le cadre d'un contrat à durée indéterminée à temps plein, au poste de directeur commercial statut cadre, en application de la convention collective des transports routiers et des
ECLI:CEDH:001-233369
26 mars 2024
Did the applicant duly exhaust the remedies available in domestic law in respect of his complaint under Articles 3 and 5, as required by Article 35 § 1 of the Convention
ECLI:CEDH:001-172518
10 mars 2017
to the final judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee in this case and to the violations established; Recalling that the violations of the Convention found by the Court in this case concern
ECLI:CEDH:001-217366
22 avril 2022
In the affirmative, did the applicant have a fair hearing in the determination of the criminal charges against her, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Sancaklı v.
cr
61372628cd58014677423669
13 février 2002
d'emprisonnement avec sursis ; Vu le mémoire produit ; Sur le moyen unique de cassation, pris de la violation des articles 177 de l'ancien Code pénal, 112-1, 121-1 et 433-1 du Code pénal, 6. 2 de la Convention
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2014:C101204
15 octobre 2014
légalement formées tiennent lieu de loi à ceux qui les ont faites en application de l'article 1134 du code civil ; que chacune des conventions de prêt en cause a été conclue entre une société qui n'est