margin-left:18pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Interim Resolution ResDH(2001)79 concerning the judgment of the European Court

Ont été entendus au cours de l’audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Cerf, première conseillère, - et les conclusions de M. Phulpin, rapporteur public. Considérant ce qui suit : 1.

    On 31 May and 14 July 2000 respectively the Tirana Court of Appeal (“the Court of Appeal”) and the Supreme Court upheld the District Court’s decision of 20 April 2000, finding that the first

  Reasonableness of the length of proceedings Time required for transmission of case file to Supreme Court was fifteen and a half months; the Court cannot accept a period of total inactivity of such

The City Court found in his favour and awarded him damages.

Finally, the court held that the causal link had in any event been broken because removal of the mole on 19 April 2002 (and not a month and a half later) would not have significantly changed the course

In the course of September and October 2000 the applicants submitted further information at the court’s request and paid the court fee.

The applicant was indicted on 3 counts of homicide, 19 counts of robbery, 19 counts of infringement of personal liberty, 4 counts of assault causing grievous bodily harm, 7 counts of trespass and 3 counts

    On 27 January 2009 the Court of Cassation upheld the first-instance court’s decision. 19.

    The Court further reiterates in this context that the admissibility of evidence is a matter for regulation by national law and the national courts and that the Court’s only concern is to

The parties have not informed the Court of the subsequent course of those proceedings.

    On 14 October 2002 the Düsseldorf Court of Appeal, on the applicant's further appeal, quashed the District Court's decision dated 16 August 2002 and the Regional Court's decision dated 9

  On the applicant's appeal, the Vienna Court of Appeal (Oberlandesgericht) on .. July 1970 confirmed the lower court's decision.

  Students representing universities in eleven countries will compete against each other on 6 and 7 April 2010 at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, in a case concerning incidents at

CIV. 3 JT COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 25 juin 2020 Rejet non spécialement motivé M.

III K 1715/06) and Warsaw Regional Court (case no. unknown); 2 levels of jurisdiction.   The applicant did not lodge a complaint under the 2004 Act in the course of the proceedings.

While the advice of receipt of its letter was returned to the Court, counsel did not reply to the Court’s letter sent to him by registered mail and in fact did not respond to the Court’s correspondence

Monsieur X a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 22 août 2016, à la suite du refus opposé par le maire de Ris-Orangis à sa demande de

Madame X a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 18 juin 2018, à la suite du refus opposé par la maire de Paris à sa demande de copie, par

Maître X, X, a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 16 août 2016, à la suite du refus opposé par le préfet du Val-de-Marne à sa demande