On 12   November 1996 Francesc-Xavier Pla Pujol died. The codicil was opened on 27 November 1996. 15.

The Government informed the Court that on 19 May 2004 the applicant had died. They asked the Court to strike the application out of its list of cases.

The applicant’s wife died on 11 October 1989. There were two children of the marriage, born on 13 April 1978 and 2 November 1982. In 1997 the applicant applied for widows’ benefits and was refused.

before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention;        Whereas the Committee of Ministers was informed that the applicant had died

III] Article 2 Positive obligations Effectiveness of the investigation into murders involving a criminal organisation: no violation   Facts : The applicants are close relatives of two persons who died

They both died in the explosion. The public prosecutor launched an investigation into the incident.

Medical treatment was rapidly administered but he died. A judicial investigation was opened to establish how and why death had occurred.

His case was still pending when he died more than nine years later. The Court struck out Mr Gładkowski’s application after his widow decided not to pursue the case.

By letter dated 22 October 2013 the applicant’s lawyer informed the Registry that the applicant had died and that his son wished to continue pursuing the application before the Court.

    By letter of 18 March 2013, the governor of the facility where the applicant was detained informed the Court that the applicant had died on 10   March 2013, without leaving relatives

On 10 October 2012 the Government informed the Court that the applicant had died on 14 June 2008.

She died on 24   January 2007.

The applicant’s partners died, respectively, on 12 July 2015 and 3   November 2014. The applicants requested survivor’s pensions.

On 24 January 2020 the Government informed the Court that the applicant had died on 27 August 2019 and further requested the Court to strike out the application.

In their observations, the Government informed the Court that the applicant had died on 6 April 2017 and further requested the Court to strike out the application.

In their observations, the Government informed the Court that the applicant had died on 6 July 2017 and further requested the Court to strike out the application.

    In view of the fact that the applicant’s son, Mr Vyrzhikovskiy, had died on 12 October 2010 in St.

    On 4 May 2018 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that the applicant had died and that his heir had expressed the wish to continue the proceedings. 4.

    On 4 May 2018 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that the applicant had died and that his heir had expressed the wish to continue the proceedings. 4.

The applicant died on 2 January 2009. The applicant’s heirs, Mr Filippo Serino and Mrs Lucia Serino, informed the Court that they wished to pursue the application in the late applicant’s stead.