On 1 July 2008 the applicants’ representative informed the Court that she had lost contact with the applicants and that she no longer wished to represent them before the Court.

The applicants were required to submit their observations in reply, however, the contact with the applicants has been lost (see appended table for details).

admissibility and merits had not been received by 5 February 2007, on 16 March 2007 the Court advised the applicant by registered mail that her failure to respond might lead to the conclusion that she had lost

They requested the Court to accept the GYLA’s letter of 13 April 2007 as an indication of the fact that the applicant had lost interest in the proceedings before the Court and to strike the application

and the outcome of the criminal proceedings; that he had to pay the legal fees for his state-appointed lawyer; about the refusal of the authorities to release him on parole; and that his clothes were lost

She was convicted of breaching official secrets and lost her employment in the Public Prosecutor’s Office. The applicant was prosecuted for inciting another to disclose official secrets.

Registry about the developments in their cases, the change of their respective addresses, and the absence of any correspondence from them despite the Court’s requests and warnings, indicate that they have lost

revocation of the security clearance of the applicant, a diplomat employed with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and related civil proceedings for the applicant’s dismissal on the grounds of her having lost

Against this background, the Court considers that the applicants have lost interest in pursuing their application.

The German Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, in power since 1998, had lost early parliamentary elections.

In the instant case the applicant, who is a politician, as a result of having been deemed a “lustration liar” by a final judgment, lost his seat in Parliament and cannot be a candidate for future elections

Against this background, the Court considers that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing the application.

The applicants were required to submit their observations in reply, however, the contact with the applicants was lost (see appended table for details).

In order to assess the loss sustained by the applicants, it therefore decided that the date on which they had established with legal certainty that they had lost the right of ownership over the property

As a result, the applicants lost approximately two-thirds of the pension which they could have expected to receive on the basis of the domestic courts’ case-law.

Procédure devant la Cour : A une requête et un mémoire, enregistrés les 8 février et 13 décembre 2023, les consorts H, représentés par Me Loste, demandent à la Cour : 1°) d'annuler ce jugement du

Bozzi, premier conseiller, - les conclusions de Mme Peuvrel, rapporteure publique, - et les observations de Me Loste pour la société requérante et de M. A, représentant l'Etat.

Spain [GC] (nos. 8675/15 and 8697/15, § 73, 13 February 2020), the Court has held that a situation, when the applicant’s representative had lost touch with his or her client, including in cases concerning

Against this background, the Court observes that the matter has been resolved and that the second applicant has lost interest in pursuing the application.