Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225682
1 juin 2023
1 juin 2023
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-141901
17 février 2014
17 février 2014
The national courts allowed the pre-trial statements to be read out and admitted these statements as evidence without examination of the witnesses during trials.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230919
11 janvier 2024
11 janvier 2024
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based, Prot. 7
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-144056
14 avril 2014
14 avril 2014
The national courts allowed the pre-trial statements to be read out and admitted these statements as evidence without examination of the witnesses during trials.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113899
17 septembre 2012
17 septembre 2012
Contested trial 2.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68148-68616
15 juin 2000
15 juin 2000
Before giving his testimony, the trial judge ordered the confiscation of the notes which the applicant had been compiling on the evidence adduced at the trial against him.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-198548
24 octobre 2019
24 octobre 2019
The application mainly concerns the applicant’s right to a fair trial on account of the alleged violations of his right to defend himself in person before the trial court under Article 6 § 3 (c), as the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-170268
12 décembre 2016
12 décembre 2016
On 1 November 2012 the Sevastopol Balaklava District Court (“the trial court”) committed the applicant for trial and decided that he should remain in detention.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0412DEC002393494
12 avril 1996
12 avril 1996
at his trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC001449007
22 janvier 2013
22 janvier 2013
Since that date he has been in pre-trial detention.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-200284
10 décembre 2019
10 décembre 2019
detention and the trial court’s failure to properly examine his requests for release.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-230920
11 janvier 2024
11 janvier 2024
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based, Prot. 7
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113369
7 septembre 2012
7 septembre 2012
about the actions by the trial judge or about any breach of confidentiality of jury deliberations.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7693
9 juillet 2013
9 juillet 2013
In view of the time they had already spent in pre-trial detention, they were released.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9954
8 juillet 2014
8 juillet 2014
Turkey - 38270/11 Judgment 8.7.2014 [Section II] Article 5 Article 5-3 Length of pre-trial detention Reasonableness of pre-trial detention Pre-trial detention for over a year of investigative journalists
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10674
8 juillet 2014
8 juillet 2014
Turkey - 53413/11 Judgment 8.7.2014 [Section II] Article 5 Article 5-3 Length of pre-trial detention Reasonableness of pre-trial detention Pre-trial detention for over a year of investigative journalists
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126676
3 septembre 2013
3 septembre 2013
been referred to the trial court, which had two months to decide on the applicant’s further detention.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9333
27 mars 2014
27 mars 2014
However, she did not give evidence before the trial court owing to her fragile mental state. The applicant was ultimately convicted.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0310DEC001132710
10 mars 2022
10 mars 2022
Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 (c) of this Article shall be ... entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216970
25 mars 2022
25 mars 2022
The prosecutor asked for an extension of the applicant’s pre-trial detention based on the risk of absconding.
Source officiellePage 66 sur 1635