Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2060373-2194027
17 juillet 2007
17 juillet 2007
The Court therefore held that there had been a violation of Article 11.
Source officielleRéférés Cabinet 3
67f0263d02fc178212f7f2ec
4 avril 2025
4 avril 2025
Par requête reçue au greffe le 4 avril 2025, la société HELLAS DIRECT sollicite la rectification d'une erreur matérielle relative à la dénomination de la société condamnée.
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253caf0bd3db21cbdd8c7cf
10 novembre 2008
10 novembre 2008
DÉCISION : Helder X... a déposé plainte le 14 décembre 2006 pour des violences.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1048088-1089587
15 juillet 2004
15 juillet 2004
It accordingly held unanimously that there had been no violation of Article 2.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1396804-1463128
15 juillet 2005
15 juillet 2005
It therefore held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-649053-654741
12 novembre 2002
12 novembre 2002
It also held that the question of the application of Article 41 was not ready for decision.
Source officielleRéférés
6a0c6a25cdc6046d473155a2
28 avril 2026
28 avril 2026
l'intégralité de ses demandes, fins et conclusions à l'encontre de la société HELLIO SOLUTIONS ; Renvoyer la société [C] [M] à mieux se pourvoir ; Condamner la société [C] [M] à verser à la société HELLIO
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2579
31 juillet 2007
31 juillet 2007
order for administrative detention for contempt of court: violation Facts : The applicant accompanied a woman he was representing to the courthouse to obtain a copy of the record of a hearing held
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-558306-560366
29 mai 2002
29 mai 2002
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. A decision on admissibility will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68392-68860
6 mars 2001
6 mars 2001
The European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and that the finding of a violation constituted sufficient just satisfaction for any non-pecuniary damage
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68185-68653
3 avril 2001
3 avril 2001
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. A decision on the admissibility of the applications will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68137-68605
5 juillet 2000
5 juillet 2000
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68289-68757
15 février 2000
15 février 2000
Denmark, the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 (length of civil proceedings) of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-517775-519191
14 mars 2002
14 mars 2002
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. The decision on admissibility will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-894853-919510
16 décembre 2003
16 décembre 2003
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. A Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68165-68633
23 mai 2000
23 mai 2000
After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68162-68630
13 juin 2000
13 juin 2000
After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68086-68554
15 juin 1999
15 juin 1999
adviser Applicant company: Bohuslav Mazourek , counsel Jiří Svoboda , lawyer After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68066-68534
21 septembre 1999
21 septembre 1999
Nevertheless, by virtue of Law No. 542/1977, as interpreted by the Supreme Administrative Court, Mr Klavdianos was held personally responsible for the payment of his company’s tax obligation and an order
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-862613-884869
24 octobre 2003
24 octobre 2003
In a fax of 3 October 2003, the Georgian Government asked the Court to adjourn the mission to Georgia, in view of the general election to be held there on 2 November 2003 and the authorities’ concern
Source officiellePage 68 sur 2440