CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-189
15 décembre 1998
Inadmissible under Article 6 §§   1 and 3   (d): It is not within the competence of the Court to substitute its own assessment of the facts and the evidence for that of the domestic courts.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3771
15 juillet 2005
The domestic courts, at two instances, gave judgment for the plaintiffs. The applicant appealed to the Supreme Court and subsequently submitted a constitutional complaint.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0917DEC001049521
17 septembre 2024
lodged with the Court.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0125JUD007660713
25 janvier 2018
However, in accordance with domestic law and, in particular, the Federal Court of Justice’s and Federal Constitutional Court’s case-law (see paragraphs 19-2 2 above), the Regional Court had nevertheless
ECLI:CEDH:002-9648
25 février 1993
The authorities had taken no steps to ensure that cases still pending after abolition of National Security Court and Paris Military Court were dealt with swiftly, and the ordinary courts had been slow
ECLI:CEDH:002-9960
19 février 1991
  ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (D) OF THE CONVENTION Reiteration of Court's case-law on concept of "witness" and on production of evidence.
7ème Chambre
DTA_2008574_20251006
6 octobre 2025
D..., décédé en cours d’instance, ainsi que Mme G... E... et M. A...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0913DEC005769408
13 septembre 2011
On 17 November 2006 the Kraków District Court ( Sąd Rejonowy ) remanded him in custody, on suspicion of leading an organised criminal group engaged in human trafficking and several counts of extortion.
8e Chambre A
6034f910e1304d26c30bcbff
23 juin 2016
ERMENEUX-LEVAIQUE-ARNAUD & ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE assistée par Me Rodolphe MACHETTI de l'ASSOCIATION MACHETTI - CREPEAUX - VERGERIO, avocat au barreau de GRASSE substituée par Me Rachel COURT-MENIGOZ
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0921DEC000373717
21 septembre 2021
It confirmed the Regional Court’s findings that, having regard to the concrete state of evidence in the criminal proceedings against the applicant before that court, there remained a strong suspicion of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0131JUD002277503
31 janvier 2008
The court further rejected the remainder of principal and counter claims. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205DEC006374119
5 février 2026
THE LAW In the present application, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that the applicant’s complaints concerning her right to examine expert witness Yu. in the course of the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513JUD000621908
13 mai 2014
    On 4 June 2007 the applicant pleaded guilty in the Crown Court at Luton to three counts of dishonestly obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception (counts one, two and three on the indictment
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-128029
9 octobre 2013
The court noted that in the course of the applicant’s arrest, banknotes marked by the police had been found on him and that the applicant’s clothes and a syringe found on him on the day of the arrest contained
ECLI:CEDH:002-10041
24 mai 1991
  Relevant criteria Reasonableness of length of proceedings: to be assessed in light of circumstances of case and criteria laid down in Court's case-law.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10278
3 décembre 1991
Conclusion : cases ordered to be struck out of the list, subject to the possibility of their being restored thereto in the event of a new situation justifying such a course (unanimously).
ECLI:CEDH:002-10284
ECLI:CEDH:002-10280
ECLI:CEDH:002-10288
ECLI:CEDH:002-10268
Page 69 sur 36913
SOCIETE FRANCOIS, DUFLOT, COURT-MENIGOZ SOCIETE CIVILE PROFESSIONNELLE D'AVOCATS
24/06/2018
Voir →