CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0829DEC006936112
29 août 2017
The letter of 14 October 2016 was returned back to the Court as unreceived on 7 November 2016, with a mention stating that the applicant had died.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11260
13 octobre 2016
Her husband, the second and third applicants’ father, was also attacked during the same incident and subsequently died from his injuries.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0404DEC003858706
4 avril 2019
He died on 2 January 2009.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0430DEC001521309
30 avril 2020
On 25 November 2019 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that the applicant had died.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-163373
4 mai 2016
He died on 22   February 1992 during the war in Croatia. The applicant, as his widow and the mother of his child, obtained the right to a survivor’s pension after her husband’s death.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0514DEC003683715
14 mai 2020
On 24 January 2020 the Government informed the Court that the applicant had died on 27 August 2019 and further requested the Court to strike out the application.
ECLI:CEDH:001-245918
6 octobre 2025
Didych was run over by a car driven by certain B., unrelated to the police, and died instantly at the scene due to the injuries sustained. As of February 2025, official investigations into Mr S.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56234
17 juin 2003
declared admissible the complaint relating to the excessive length of two sets of proceedings concerning civil rights and obligations before the administrative courts;   Recalling that the applicant died
ECLI:CEDH:001-220217
27 septembre 2022
early March 2014 P.S., being in a severe condition, was admitted to the same hospital where he had previously undergone the last two surgeries and was transferred to the intensive care unit where he died
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1214DEC000678321
14 décembre 2023
On 6   July 2021 the Government, in their observations, informed the Court that the applicant had died on 25 May 2021.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0215DEC005909816
15 février 2024
On 25 May 2022 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that the applicant had died on 27 May 2018, and she named the late applicant’s mother as a potential heir, indicating her last known
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0629DEC005505716
29 juin 2023
On 31 May 2022 the Government made a request to restore the application to the Court’s list of cases, as during the enforcement of the Court’s decision they had learned that the applicant had died on 2
ECLI:CEDH:001-223083
19 janvier 2023
The applicant’s father died in November 2021.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC000678106
10 mai 2011
By letters of 20 October 2010 and 28 February 2011 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that the applicant had died, that no relatives or heirs had been traced, and that she (the representative
ECLI:CEDH:002-4952
29 avril 2003
She died from her injuries.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517DEC003041114
17 mai 2016
On 29 March 2015 the applicant’s representative informed the Court that the applicant had died, without specifying the date, and that his daughter might wish to pursue the application in his stead.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1017DEC003977020
17 octobre 2024
From the documents submitted by the Government it transpires that the applicant had died on 22 November 2023 in Arad Prison.
ECLI:CEDH:001-205313
23 septembre 2020
The applicant’s partner died on 24   March 2015, without any prior registration of their civil partnership although they had notarized their partnership agreement.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0321DEC003887015
21 mars 2019
On 4 November 2015 the applicant’s representative informed the Registry that the applicant had died and that her son wished to pursue the application.
ECLI:CEDH:001-213146
11 octobre 2021
By letter dated 3   September 2021, the applicant’s son, Mr   Vitaliy Bakin, informed the Court that the applicant had died on 7   April 2021 and that he wished to pursue this application
Page 69 sur 390
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.