CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503JUD001184303
3 mai 2007
Article 69a reads as follows: Article 69a “Any individual who without good cause (i) obtains access to another person's house or any other place not freely accessible (skaffer sig adgang
Page 69 sur 105
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1221JUD003087396
21 décembre 2000
I had one hand handcuffed to the bed and an intravenous drip attached to my other arm. My feet were of course also attached to the bed. On this occasion the judge arrived with some lawyers.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0812JUD004778409
12 août 2014
Since then, the Government have published a draft bill, which has undergone parliamentary scrutiny by a joint committee of both Houses of Parliament.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-112485
11 juillet 2012
The officers who went to Mr Dimitrov’s house found there his de facto wife, the second applicant, and his son, the first applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0408JUD003104510
8 avril 2014
This provision was considered by the House of Lords in the case of Express Newspapers Ltd v. McShane and another ([1980] AC 672).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0720JUD002350509
20 juillet 2010
In the context of Afghanistan, UNHCR would like to draw to your attention to the fact that an assessment of a refugee claim of an Afghan female asylum-seeker, should take into account the specifically
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1209JUD003122609
9 décembre 2025
“A courier” of the PKK had visited him in Istanbul and had taken him to Cizre and had left him at a house.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0915JUD001560207
15 septembre 2016
Finally, the prosecution invited the jury to draw adverse inferences as to the applicant’s guilt based on his failure to disclose facts material to his defence when first interviewed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0221JUD003213108
21 février 2012
But as a dabbler in amateur psychology I would like to draw attention to a small detail.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0601JUD006281917
1 juin 2021
They have wide discretion, the aim being to draw up an individualised confinement path for the detainee, adapted to his or her mental disorder and risk level, while complying with the rules applicable
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0523JUD005389120
23 mai 2023
In April 2019 she moved in with D.M., into his house in a village; he provided for her upkeep and she kept some of her personal belongings there.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD001756406
24 mai 2016
At around 8 a.m. he had been put in a prison van and had been taken to the court house. He had come back to the remand prison at 10 p.m.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD007793811
1 juillet 2014
The officers of the first group went to Mr Dimitrov’s house and found there his de facto wife, the second applicant, and his son, the first applicant.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0701DEC001603990
1 juillet 1992
By judgment of 6 June 1988 the District Court decided in accordance with the social authority's recommendation, to allow the applicant access to his son, initially with two and subsequently three hours
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1013JUD001198115
13 octobre 2016
Article 3 § 5 of Presidential Decree No. 61/1999 (on the procedure for the examination of asylum applications), the Minister for Public Order should have taken a decision within twenty-four hours
ECLI:CEDH:001-175332
16 juin 2017
damage to health, and where special means or a weapon are used, a police officer shall submit a report about the use of physical force, special means or a weapon to his supervisor within twenty-four hours
ECLI:CEDH:001-176158
12 juillet 2017
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0201JUD007205916
1 février 2022
However, the prosecution did not examine as a whole the numerous related complaints brought by the adult applicants and failed to draw relevant conclusions and pursue adequate and timely actions.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC001377807
12 janvier 2010
He further complained that the Court of Appeal did not draw any consequences from the mother's obstructive behaviour, such as her repeated travels.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC001832404
29 septembre 2009
Unlike those cases, which concerned either constant or night ‑ time noise, it is logical to assume that the noise, if any, in the present case, was likely to be restricted to office hours and unlikely