The domestic authorities had not adduced relevant and sufficient reasons for their decision to make a residence order in favour of the child’s mother.

On 16 May 2005 and 11 August 2006 the court bailiffs returned the writs of execution due to impossibility to have the judgments in the applicant's favour enforced.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No. 1 of non-enforcement of five judgments in his favour.

Accordingly, the judgments in the applicants’ favour should be regarded as issued against a private company.

    The Ministry lodged appeals on points of law against the judgments of 15 June 2010 in favour of the third and fourth applicants and the judgment of 18 June 2010 in favour of the first applicant

  1 about the delayed enforcement of the same judgment in his favour. THE LAW In line with the Burdov ( no.

A..., représentée par la SELARL Cabinet Laurent Favet, avocat, demande au tribunal : 1°) à titre principal, d’annuler l’arrêté du 17 octobre 2024 par lequel le préfet de la Loire lui a interdit l’exercice

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 16 décembre 2024, l’association Club alpin français de Roanne, représentée par la SELARL Cabinet Laurent Favet, avocat, demande au tribunal

The applicant was also convicted under section   7 §   2 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act of disseminating propaganda in favour of that organisation on the grounds that he had referred to a

En ce qui concerne Stiven Faith A E, Benjamin Almonade Ndong B et Laïky Favor Obame B : 3.

    The applicants obtained final court judgments in their favour.

  1 concerning the non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicants' favour to the Government.

Le 29 novembre 2006, le médecin du travail, intervenant dans le cadre d'une étude du poste de Monsieur [B] [G], a conclu que seul le poste de confection de fagots était compatible dès lors qu'une série

, their prolonged non ‑ enforcement prior to their quashing and non-enforcement or delayed enforcement of other judgments in their favour. 18.

demande tendant au sursis à exécution de la décision du 19 novembre 1993 par laquelle le directeur des services vétérinaires du Puy-de-Dôme a consigné 500 bovins sur le domaine de la Muratelle à Ars-les-Favets

Application no. 64138/11 Semih POLAT against Turkey lodged on 16 October 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the conviction of the applicant for six counts of disseminating propaganda in favour

By a final judgment dated 23 May 2007 the Supreme Court of Justice found in the applicant’s favour and ordered the employer to reinstate her.

  1 and urging that the judgments in their favour be promptly and fully executed.

On 8 June 1999 the Khabarovsk Garrison Military Court (“the Khabarovsk Court”) ruled in the applicant’s favour.