Italy, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President,   Dragoljub Popović,   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre,   András

    The Court reiterates that, even if the primary purpose of Article 6, as far as criminal proceedings are concerned, is to ensure a fair trial by a “tribunal” competent to determine “any criminal

Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Paulo

Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing within a reasonable time

The Court considers that these provisions were not, in themselves, incompatible with the fair trial guarantees of Article 6 § 1. 27.

    THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL 15.     The applicant complained of an infringement of his right to a fair trial and, in particular, to the equality of arms.

It was usually considerably lower than the fair market rent.

In this context, importance is to be attached to, inter alia , the appearance of the fair administration of justice and to the increased sensitivity of the public to the fair administration of justice

He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ..

Croatia (dec.), no. 43440/98, ECHR 2000-X).

Croatia , no. 28261/06, §§   21-22, 15   January 2009, with further references). 53.

On 4 May 2000 the European Court of Human Rights issued a decision in the case of Naletilić v. the Republic of Croatia (no.   51891/99).

Croatia , nos.   38767/07 et al., §§ 26-29, 18 October 2011; Vojtěchová v.   Slovakia , no.   59102/08, §§   27-28, 25 September 2012). 29.

Croatia , no. 61260/08, § 46, 20 May 2010, with further references).

In others, the request is made to the court whose decision is challenged (Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia).

    Law no. 4055/2012 on “fair trial within a reasonable time” came into force on 2 April 2012.

The German legislature had failed to strike a fair balance between his interest in enjoying the use of his property and the alleged general interest in the practice of hunting.

Since questions regarding the knowledge of the informant had so far been refused, this exclusion violated the principle of fair trial.

As far as the taking of evidence from Dr W.B. was concerned, this was a means of introducing a private expert opinion into the proceedings and served no other apparent purpose.