On 23 March 2021 the applicants lodged an individual application with the Constitutional Court complaining essentially about the excessive length of the proceedings before the labour courts

There is no need for the Court to examine whether the length of the proceedings was reasonable, however, as the application must be dismissed for another reason.

Olivier N..., demeurant ..., 123 / de Mme Marie-C Morin, demeurant ..., 124 / de M.

In particular, the Court notes that the proceedings in question were terminated on 14 March 2007 when the Supreme Court rendered its decision.

In particular, the Court notes the Government’s observations according to which the applicant filed administrative claims of inadequate prison conditions on 25 March 2019 and 10 March 2020 and the cases

concerning the length of proceedings.

    On 27 March 2023 the second applicant filed an individual application with the Constitutional Court, complaining of a violation of his right to a fair trial on account of the excessive length

    Between 3 March 2000 and 21 March 2001, the Ankara Civil Court collected further evidence in the case. 19.

On 30 March 2003 the applicant lodged an application with the Court against Finland (no. 11704/03), complaining, inter alia , about the length of these proceedings and the lack of an effective remedy in

COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of proceedings.

Russia [GC], no. 35589/08, §§ 76-78, 30 March 2017).   FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,   1.

ÚS 3383/23, delivered on 27 March 2025.

length of criminal proceedings.

10.67pt; font:7pt 'Times New Roman'; display:inline-block } .s995BFA6B { margin-top:10pt; margin-bottom:5pt } RESOLUTION DH (98) 89 CONCERNING THE JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF 25 MARCH

the excessive length of bankruptcy proceedings which lasted more than ten years.

According to the applicant, an investigation into the alleged offences of, inter alia, fabricating evidence, commenced in March 2011, and ended in March 2014.

In a judgment of 9 March 1998 the Kyustendil District Court found the applicant guilty as charged.

  On 14 March 1985 he set down the hearing for 11 April.

    The application form, dated 2 March 2017, reached the Court on 24   March 2017.

    On 15 March 1990 the applicant petitioned the Naples District Court for judicial separation from his wife, Mrs R.