CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0201JUD002479114
1 février 2022
Let us return two years back in time, to 27 March 2007.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C110168
15 mars 2017
CIV. 1 MY1 COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Audience publique du 15 mars 2017 Rejet non spécialement motivé Mme BATUT, président Décision n° 10168 F Pourvoi
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0309JUD000972017
9 mars 2023
HUNGARY (Application no. 9720/17)             JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 9 March 2023   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
Chambre 4-2
65a236da7ca18b0008e57f5e
12 janvier 2024
APPELANT Monsieur [N] [Y], demeurant [Adresse 2] représenté par Me Renata JARRE, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE substitué par Me Alexis RINGUE, avocat au barreau de MARSEILLE INTIMEE
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0507JUD006151009
7 mai 2014
    On 10 March 2009 the District Court dismissed the charge of aggravated armed robbery.
11e Chambre A
603271014358d2a55ea8a11a
1 février 2018
Elle ajoute que pour moderniser son outil de fabrication, elle a, le 1er mars 2012, installé de nouvelles machines neuves pour une somme de 491.272 euros hors taxes.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0521JUD004728309
21 mai 2019
The applicant asked for the ring that K. had stolen from his flat and sold to Kras. The applicant threatened the latter with a gun and Kras. gave the ring back to the applicant. 10.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-147738
9 octobre 2014
On 26 March 2010 the Council of Ministers decided to expropriate 2,529   square metres of land with a view to building the ring road of Sofia; that land included part of the second applicant’s plot
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0316DEC005690711
16 mars 2021
    The forensic report stated that the fingerprints found on the charger of the gun belonged to Sinan Özkılınç’s right hand ring finger. No other fingerprints were observed on the gun.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1206DEC006577414
6 décembre 2022
    On 26 March 2004 the applicants started legal action against the Ministry of Transportation.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0113DEC004513898
13 janvier 2000
    On 3 March 1997, the proceedings started before the Assize Court of Athens.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0906JUD003867202
6 septembre 2007
The applicant's land was included in an area in which a ring-road and a hospital were to be constructed in the future. 9.
PRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1794500-1882348
22 septembre 2006
  He was charged by the Italian authorities with being a member of a criminal gang operating an illegal immigration ring and being an accomplice to murder.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0623JUD007663511
23 juin 2020
The court stated that the first applicant had been informed of the court decision of 23 March 2011 on 26   March 2011, but had lodged his appeal on 6 April 2011, whereas it should have been lodged
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12882
25 juin 2020
Belgium [GC], 23380/09, 28 September 2015, Information Note 188 ; Armani da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], 5878/08, 30 March 2016, Information Note 194 ; Hovhannisyan v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0218DEC002846110
18 février 2014
The action was heard by the Košice I District Court ( Okresný súd ) on 6   December 2005, 27 March, 13 June and 16 June 2006. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0325JUD000090105
25 mars 2010
He found that the applicant's loss of earning capacity since March 1990 for surgical reasons alone was below 25 per cent. 13.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1201DEC001877891
1 décembre 1993
        On 3 September 1990 the Salzburg Customs Office, in a preliminary decision, dismissed the applicant's appeal against its decision of 28 March 1990.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0927DEC004504615
27 septembre 2022
seek a settlement, according to a memorandum submitted to the Council of Ministers by the Minister of Public Works in December 2014, had been taken in order to unblock urgently the construction of the ring
ECLI:CEDH:001-140161
19 décembre 2013
They comprise (a) major procedural flaws within the meaning of Article 237 (see, for example, Ringier Axel Springer Slovakia, v.
Page 7 sur 17