disposition au greffe RG 2024044835 10/10/2024 ENTRE : SAS WEALTHY Gestion Privée, dont le siège social est 74 boulevard Haussmann 75008 Paris - RCS B 920358280 Partie demanderesse : comparant par Me Paul DEMAY

Any individual could challenge a member State by lodging a complaint with the European Commission against a measure or practice attributable to a member State deemed by the complainant to be in breach

Law – Article 35 § 3 (b): The sum claimed by the tax authorities and giving rise to the proceedings could not be deemed to constitute a “disadvantage” within the meaning of Article 35 §   3  

In sum, the reasons invoked by the authorities to dissolve the Association were not relevant and sufficient and the interference could not therefore be deemed to have been necessary in a democratic society

Inadmissible under Article 14 taken in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1: The applicant had a pecuniary right to a joint married couple’s pension, the calculation of which he deemed to be discriminatory

Law – Article   8: Leaving aside the question whether the applicant – a young adult who had not yet founded his own family – could be deemed to enjoy “family life” with his mother, with whom he lived

Such a situation must have been a daily source of discomfort and inconvenience for the applicant, obliged as he was to live in a space much smaller than that deemed desirable by the CPT.

Moreover, he was subjected to harsh torture and mental anguish, as he was deemed to be a military prisoner, and was regularly harassed to divulge information.

Therefore, the use of handcuffs was deemed neither malicious nor disproportionate.

The applicant’s complaints under Articles 3 and 5 § 1 and Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, concerning the alleged unlawfulness of his prolonged detention, conditions of detention deemed inadequate for

The fact that at the time there was no surveillance or medical assistance in place at the pool was deemed irrelevant, since in any event the victim could not have been saved within two to three minutes

confusion de leur patrimoine avec celui du débiteur ou de fictivité de la personne morale et, à cette fin, le tribunal ayant ouvert la procédure initiale reste compétent ; Que l'impossibilité de démêler

Représentant : Maître Julien DERVILLERS de la SELARL PROXIMA, avocats au barreau de RENNES, avocats plaidant D'UNE PART ET DEFENDEUR Monsieur [F] [K], demeurant [Adresse 9] Représentant : Me Jacques DEMAY

poursuites et diligences de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège [Adresse 1] [Localité 9] Représentée par Me Jean-pierre DEPASSE de la SCP DEPASSE, DAUGAN, QUESNEL, DEMAY

RENNES ORDONNANCE DE MISE EN ETAT DU 10 JANVIER 2023 Le dix Janvier deux mille vingt trois, date indiquée à l'issue des débats du treize décembre deux mille vingt deux, Madame Cécile MORILLON-DEMAY

MAURICE Exécutoire, copie, dossier délivrés à : Me DEMEYRE Dominique Copie délivrée à : SARL MAURICE Le JUGEMENT DU 15 Octobre 2024 Jugement rendu par décision Réputée contradictoire

LGW [Adresse 1] [Localité 2] représentée par Me Jean-philippe DEVEYER, avocat au barreau de LILLE COMPOSITION DU TRIBUNAL Président : Claire MARCHALOT, Vice Présidente Assesseur : Maureen DE LA MALENE

In particular, it dismissed the applicant’s argument that he could not be deemed to be practising a profession as he no longer received any fees.

AXA FRANCE IARD [Adresse 5] [Localité 13] représentée par Me Jean-philippe DEVEYER, avocat au barreau de LILLE S.A.R.L.

représentée par Me Sonia OULED-CHEIKH, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE at assistée de Me Jean-pierre DEPASSE de la SCP DEPASSE, DAUGAN, QUESNEL, DEMAY, avocat au barreau de RENNES, Appelante