the case for re-trial. 12.

dealt with that case. 8.

    Length of proceedings case   In the following case the 91 applicants complained in particular about the excessive length of administrative proceedings.

    For the Court, the mere fact that several experts had to be involved in order to determine the value of certain assets cannot alone explain the overall length of the case which, from a legal

On this point he considers that his case is different from Application No. 931/60 (see Collection of Decisions, Volume 6, page 41) as in that case the conviction had also concerned membership of the 'Nasjonal

margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law

margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law

Inadmissible under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1: The applicant’s mere expectation that the regulations concerning the use of military accommodation would not be changed could not be regarded as a right

The domestic courts had relied on a mere suspicion that the association’s intention was to set up parallel structures to the courts.

font-weight:normal }   Communicated on 19 October 2017   SECOND SECTION Application no. 6337/10 Gamze EROĞLU and Mehmet AKDEMIR against Turkey lodged on 22 January 2009 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law

present application, having examined all the material before it, the Court considers that for the reasons stated below, the respondent Government cannot be held liable for the protractedness of the case

    Has there been a public hearing in the present case, as required by Article   6 §   1 of the Convention?

margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law

According to the written records of the hearings, which were added to the case file by the Government after communication of the case, the applicant never made any complaint to the trial court of having

of the case to a negative one.

{ font-weight:normal }   Communicated on 28 August 2018   SECOND SECTION Application no. 61016/16 Hakime ŞENGÜL and others against Turkey lodged on 26 September 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

CASSATION SUR LE POURVOI DE LA DAME X...