CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0621JUD005718009
21 juin 2011
In the applicant’s view, the same purpose could have been achieved by placing him under house arrest. 36. On 5 June 2009 the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal.
Page 70 sur 105
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0601JUD002157105
1 juin 2017
On the contrary, it had been the police who had suddenly come to her house, and had searched for and found the PSM pistol in the yard.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113200
27 août 2012
He also attempted to obtain shelter for her in a state run “Darul Aman” woman’s refuge (translated as a “house of peace”) in Lahore but was informed that they would be unable to provide her with shelter
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0515JUD001573616
15 mai 2025
The applicant and L.A. lodged a counterclaim challenging, among other things, N.M.’s rights over the house. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0118JUD004323198
18 janvier 2005
At about 10.30 p.m. on 9 March 1996 Ms M.V. stopped her car in front of the house of a friend of her mother's and stepped out to wipe the ice from the windscreen.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0624JUD005932000
24 juin 2004
Seven photos show her with Prince Ernst August von Hannover at a horse show in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence. The accompanying article is entitled “The kiss.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1005JUD003305018
5 octobre 2023
The home, a two-story house, is located in the village of Berdavan, which is situated some 2.7 kilometres from Armenia’s border with Azerbaijan.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1117DEC006659216
17 novembre 2020
The relevant report noted the good living conditions in the house, which was kept very clean.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0926DEC001393602
26 septembre 2006
He also rejected the request to offer the opposition one hour of air-time, on the ground that their protests were illegal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC002644812
6 septembre 2016
[M.S.] explained that the council would not drag children away from existing foster parents, but that such smokers would not be used in the future.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:0601DEC000229164
1 juin 1967
"Interferences with the right of petition" (Article 25) When lodging his Application, the Applicant demanded access to his file; however, he was given only a little more than six hours' time to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0511DEC001789203
11 mai 2010
The applicant's version of the events is that he was not allowed to read the minutes of the hearings and that he was taken to “a cell” in a court-house.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1108JUD002897311
8 novembre 2012
On 4 July 2011 the applicant was released from detention and placed under house arrest.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0310JUD001465216
10 mars 2020
It gave the applicant and his wife the right to have contact with A twice a year for one and a half hours each time, and the right to have contact with B and C four times a year for one and a half hours
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD005054108
16 décembre 2014
Mr Ibrahim had seen a lawyer around seven and a half hours after his first request to see one. 68 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0301JUD004767699
1 mars 2005
It was further submitted that the appropriate test under English law for deciding whether or not magistrates acted within their jurisdiction was that laid down by the House of Lords in McC. v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0409JUD005134699
9 avril 2002
The applicant was a member of (and a spokeswoman for) a group of aliens without residence permits who in 1996 decided to take collective action to draw attention to the difficulties they
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0925JUD002075504
25 septembre 2008
At about 3 a.m. on 29 September 2002 a group of five masked men in camouflage uniforms broke into the applicants’ house. The men did not identify themselves.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110DEC000004014
10 janvier 2017
It had been the intention of the defence to make submissions to the trial judge as to lack of disclosure and an abuse of process by the prosecution, but the prosecution’s decision to drop the case meant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314JUD003621613
14 mars 2017
The children refused to leave the house and closed the shutters. An employee of the Split Social Welfare Centre who was accompanying the applicant went into the house to talk to the children alone.