CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0301JUD002908295
1 mars 2001
On that ground, the Supreme Court upheld the Regional Court’s decision, in accordance with Article 291 § 7 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
PRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2900098-3190146
20 octobre 2009
The Court referred to the Federal Constitutional Court’s decision which had noted that, according to the curriculum of the ethics classes, teachers were not allowed to unduly influence pupils.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2001:297
30 mai 2001
Ordonnance du Président de la Cour du 30 mai 2001.#Comune di Montorio al Vomano contre Commission des Communautés européennes.
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C100295
8 mars 2017
Y... avait eu connaissance de l'insanité d'esprit invoquée, la cour d'appel a violé les articles 901, 1304 et 2224 du code civil ; 2°/ que la prescription de l'action en nullité de l'acte ne court qu'à
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9509
16 septembre 1996
obligation to hear cases within reasonable time – however when applied to a Constitutional Court, obligation could not be construed in the same way as for an ordinary court.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0130DEC003585821
30 janvier 2024
    On 22 March 2021 the High Court refused the parents leave to appeal against the City Court’s judgment.
3e Section - 2e Chambre
DTA_2200302_20260209
9 février 2026
Par des mémoires, enregistrés les 18 février, 23 juin et 22 novembre 2022, et les 25 juillet et 30 novembre 2023, la société SNCF Gares et connexions, représentée par Me Préat et Me Merigot de Treigny,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0930JUD005246899
30 septembre 2003
    On 30 June 1995 the Szczecin Regional Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the District Court’s judgment. 16.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2999619-3308595
22 janvier 2010
  Merits The Court considered that States could, in exercising their sovereign power, decide – for reasons of their own – to withdraw lists of candidates for the post of judge at the Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0312JUD005379111
12 mars 2020
    On 2 March 2010 the Volyn Regional Court of Appeal upheld the trial court’s judgment.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0705DEC002150608
5 juillet 2011
On the same date the Regional Court upheld the first-instance judgment. The Regional Court’s judgment was served on the applicant on 29 February 2008.
ECLI:EU:C:1967:27
5 juillet 1967
Sentenza della Corte del 5 luglio 1967.#Stanislas Ciechelski contro Caisse régionale de sécurité sociale du Centre d'Orléans e directeur régional de la sécurité sociale d'Orléans.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0108JUD002425403
8 janvier 2008
    The Court notes that the applicant was charged with several counts of extortion which he had committed in relapse into crime and acting in an organised criminal group.
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2025:C300327
26 juin 2025
immobilière Videau qui lui avait révélé la surestimation de son bien, la cour d'appel a violé l'article 2224 du code civil. » Réponse de la Cour Vu l'article 2224 du code civil : 6.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2976969-3279382
21 décembre 2009
These procedures, which are intended to help the Court tackle its heavy caseload, apply solely to those countries which have accepted them either by ratifying Protocol No. 14 bis (adopted in Madrid) or
ECLI:CEDH:002-13231
20 avril 2021
On the other hand, the Court had emphasised the connection between the preliminary review of the reasons for carrying out undercover operations and the court’s subsequent capacity to examine pleas of entrapment
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010DEC005046816
10 octobre 2017
    The applicant was subsequently charged with six counts under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977. His jury trial opened in the Circuit Court on 13   November 2014.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0217DEC002872711
17 février 2015
the [Court’s] judgment, but involves the precise identification of the matter examined by the [Court] and its relation to the circumstances taking place in the course of the [domestic] adjudication of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1010JUD004209598
10 octobre 2000
    Petition to quash or amend a lower court's judgment Under Article 417 § 4 of the CCP the President of the Supreme Court, the President of the Court of Appeal, presidents of regional courts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929JUD001901105
29 septembre 2009
Court’s finding. 22.
Page 71 sur 36913
SOCIETE FRANCOIS, DUFLOT, COURT-MENIGOZ SOCIETE CIVILE PROFESSIONNELLE D'AVOCATS
24/06/2018
Voir →