The judgments in the applicants’ favour became final but the authorities delayed their enforcement.

    The Court notes that the judgment given in the applicant's favour remained unenforced for one year and nine months. 18.

    The Government submitted that the judgment in the applicant's favour had been fully enforced.

    The applicant complained, under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, about continued non-enforcement of a judgment in his favour. 4.

    The applicant complained, under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, about continued non-enforcement of a judgment in his favour. 4.

The domestic court had found Mrs V.’s allegations about one incident sufficiently credible to issue an interim protection order in her favour the day after she had brought protection-order proceedings.

    In the remainder, the judgments given in the applicant’s favour are still unenforced. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 13.

The Court finds that by failing for years to comply with the enforceable judgment in the applicant's favour the domestic authorities impaired the essence of his right to a court and prevented him from

the appended table domestic courts delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts and/or to have certain actions taken by State authorities in their favour

    Complaints concerning lengthy non-enforcement of the judgments in the applicants' favour Following the Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v.

    The applicant instituted proceedings in the City Court against the Bailiffs’ Service for failure to execute the decisions in his favour.

    The applicant complained about the quashing of the judgment in his favour by way of supervisory review. 4.

    As possible under the rules governing orders for payment in favour of banks (see paragraph 33 below), at the bank’s request the court directed that the order be enforced immediately and issued

On the dates indicated in the Appendix, the supervisory review courts allowed the authorities’ applications and quashed the final judgments in the applicants’ favour.

He put forward an additional complaint arguing that the authorities had failed to enforce the new judgment issued in his favour on 29 February 2000. 27.

le moyen unique, pris en ses deux branches : Attendu que, par jugement du 29 juin 1983, le tribunal de commerce de Bruxelles a prononcé la faillite de la Société pour le développement et la favorisation

It was pursuant to those agreements that the possibility of an allocation of income tax in favour of the Catholic Church had been established in 1987, by means of a specific allocation of a percentage

    On 19 September 2003 the Court decided to communicate the applicant's complaints about non-enforcement of the judgment in her favour to the Government.

The Court is satisfied that the excessive length of the execution of judgments in the applicants’ favour is acknowledged by the Government either explicitly or in substance.