In this regard the Court notes, firstly, that the last decision taken in the case dates from 6 April 2007, which was seven years after S.K.’s death (on 29 March 2000).

  In the case of S.Z. v.

    On 22 March 2011 the medical commission of the Execution of Punishments Directorate examined the applicant’s case.

In the case of Kosumova v.

The fact that the expropriation of the applicants’ land had been carried out by a private company did not by any means preclude the existence of public interest in the present case. 42.

In the case of Mher Alikhanyan v.

  In the case of Kozlov v.

In the case of Levon Alikhanyan v.

In the case of Öngün v.

In particular, the Constitutional Court made reference to the Court’s judgments in the cases of Gębura v. Poland , no. 63131/00, 6   March 2007 and Ladent v.

Alfredo, contre l'arrêt de la cour d'assises du VAL-DE-MARNE, en date du 19 mars 2004, qui, pour assassinats et tentative d'assassinat, l'a condamné à la réclusion criminelle à perpétuité en portant

, on 7 March 2009.

with the ordinary courts which would decide on possible claims for noise remediation in cases of excessive nuisances caused by road traffic.

arrêt du 4 mars 2021 sur la demande de M.

On that date the case was adjourned until 20 March 2003, because the applicant intended to submit additional evidence to the court. 15.

    On 1 March 2011 and on 15 March 2011 respectively, the applicants were released pending trial. 10.

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

The circumstances of the cases The facts of the cases, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.

The checks are carried out and exposure is made by a Commission on the basis of information contained in the former security services’ records.