AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC002710304
2 novembre 2010
2 novembre 2010
and Mr E.S. replied “Simply because this man has been racketeered and robbed by [the applicant].
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0421JUD003609313
21 avril 2020
21 avril 2020
Even so, the Court of Appeal discontinued the criminal proceedings because the prosecution had become time-barred. 11.
Source officiellesoc
613724c2cd580146774181fc
4 juillet 2006
4 juillet 2006
Béraud, conseiller rapporteur, M. Chagny, conseiller doyen, Mme Ferré, greffier de chambre.
Source officiellesoc
613724c9cd580146774185ed
3 juillet 2007
3 juillet 2007
Béraud, conseiller rapporteur, M. Chauviré, conseiller, Mme Ferré, greffier de chambre.
Source officielleCour d'Appel
Civile, Vu le désistement d'appel de Sonia X..., appelantec/SARL AUTO LS
6253cc71bd3db21cbdd901e9
30 janvier 2013
30 janvier 2013
Représentant : Me Antoine BERAUD (avocat au barreau de MARSEILLE) Appelante SARL AUTO LS Intimée Nous, D.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Toulouse
DTA_2202826_20221019
19 octobre 2022
19 octobre 2022
B A, représenté par Me Béchard, demande au tribunal : 1°) de prononcer la majoration du taux de l'intérêt légal de cinq points à l'expiration d'un délai de deux mois à compter du jour où l'ordonnance
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
Petriec/Italy
ECLI:CEDH:001-195077
10 juillet 2019
10 juillet 2019
Article 6 of the Convention the applicants, who are members of the managerial team of the Veterinary College of Physicians, complained that the proceeding before the final-instance court were unfair because
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4346
29 juin 2004
29 juin 2004
The applicant filed a petition with the Constitutional Court which was dismissed, mainly because there was no right under the Constitution to exercise the post for which he had been elected and because
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3676
4 octobre 2005
4 octobre 2005
The Constitutional Court emphasized that under domestic law a case could only be referred back to a differently composed court when the decision appealed against had been set aside because of a substantive
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-325
29 novembre 2011
29 novembre 2011
Law – The Court found a violation of Article 5 § 4 because the remedy provided for in domestic law had not observed the principle of equality of arms between the parties, and a violation of Article
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203664
18 juin 2020
18 juin 2020
In 2014 the university stopped the distribution of the book, on the grounds that it might have a negative effect on minors because of its depiction of same-sex family relationships.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177383
5 septembre 2017
5 septembre 2017
In 1987 the applicant brought an action for abatement ( tenkis davası ) against her stepmother, claiming that she had been deprived of her reserved portion ( saklı pay ) in the inheritance because of her
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-212358
16 septembre 2021
16 septembre 2021
He claimed that he had no intent to conceal that information, because the CEC had already been aware of his daughter.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224010
6 mars 2023
6 mars 2023
His claim was eventually dismissed as time-barred because the civil courts found that the five-year statutory limitation period for seeking compensation had elapsed.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111610
23 mai 2012
23 mai 2012
COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the proceedings were not fair because he had not been summoned for the hearing before the Supreme Court of Justice and because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-237922
8 octobre 2024
8 octobre 2024
It held that because of the seriousness of the offence, the ground of upset to the legal order remained and that there was a risk of reoffending, because the report of the probation and social rehabilitation
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222221
7 décembre 2022
7 décembre 2022
The Athens Administrative Court of Appeal declared the appeals inadmissible because the applicants did not pay, as set out in the law: i) the court fees, calculated as a 2% of the value of the dispute
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226180
7 juillet 2023
7 juillet 2023
The assets were considered proceeds of crime because of the applicant’s criminal conviction, and seeing that he had not proved sufficient lawful income to rebut the statutory presumption on their criminal
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-234559
28 mai 2024
28 mai 2024
The applicant complained about the lack of impartiality of the judge sitting in a single judge formation at the Timiș District Court, because in November 2020, the judge allegedly made prejudicial remarks
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-222853
4 janvier 2023
4 janvier 2023
If so, has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to a fair hearing guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention because of a manifest error by the High Administrative Court or because the reasons
Source officiellePage 74 sur 1597