CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

31 923 résultats pour « Becaud »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC002710304

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2010

2 novembre 2010

and Mr E.S. replied “Simply because this man has been racketeered and robbed by [the applicant].

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0421JUD003609313

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2020

21 avril 2020

Even so, the Court of Appeal discontinued the criminal proceedings because the prosecution had become time-barred. 11.

Source officielle
CC

soc

613724c2cd580146774181fc

Cassation

4 juillet 2006

4 juillet 2006

Béraud, conseiller rapporteur, M. Chagny, conseiller doyen, Mme Ferré, greffier de chambre.

Source officielle
CC

soc

613724c9cd580146774185ed

Cassation

3 juillet 2007

3 juillet 2007

Béraud, conseiller rapporteur, M. Chauviré, conseiller, Mme Ferré, greffier de chambre.

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

Civile, Vu le désistement d'appel de Sonia X..., appelantec/SARL AUTO LS

6253cc71bd3db21cbdd901e9

Appel

30 janvier 2013

30 janvier 2013

Représentant : Me Antoine BERAUD (avocat au barreau de MARSEILLE) Appelante SARL AUTO LS Intimée Nous, D.

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Toulouse

DTA_2202826_20221019

Administratif

19 octobre 2022

19 octobre 2022

B A, représenté par Me Béchard, demande au tribunal : 1°) de prononcer la majoration du taux de l'intérêt légal de cinq points à l'expiration d'un délai de deux mois à compter du jour où l'ordonnance

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

Petriec/Italy

ECLI:CEDH:001-195077

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2019

10 juillet 2019

Article 6 of the Convention the applicants, who are members of the managerial team of the Veterinary College of Physicians, complained that the proceeding before the final-instance court were unfair because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4346

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2004

29 juin 2004

The applicant filed a petition with the Constitutional Court which was dismissed, mainly because there was no right under the Constitution to exercise the post for which he had been elected and because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3676

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2005

4 octobre 2005

The Constitutional Court emphasized that under domestic law a case could only be referred back to a differently composed court when the decision appealed against had been set aside because of a substantive

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-325

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2011

29 novembre 2011

Law – The Court found a violation of Article 5 §   4 because the remedy provided for in domestic law had not observed the principle of equality of arms between the parties, and a violation of Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203664

Admin. suprême

18 juin 2020

18 juin 2020

In 2014 the university stopped the distribution of the book, on the grounds that it might have a negative effect on minors because of its depiction of same-sex family relationships.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177383

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2017

5 septembre 2017

In 1987 the applicant brought an action for abatement ( tenkis davası ) against her stepmother, claiming that she had been deprived of her reserved portion ( saklı pay ) in the inheritance because of her

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-212358

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2021

16 septembre 2021

He claimed that he had no intent to conceal that information, because the CEC had already been aware of his daughter.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224010

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2023

6 mars 2023

His claim was eventually dismissed as time-barred because the civil courts found that the five-year statutory limitation period for seeking compensation had elapsed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111610

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2012

23 mai 2012

COMPLAINT The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the proceedings were not fair because he had not been summoned for the hearing before the Supreme Court of Justice and because

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-237922

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2024

8 octobre 2024

It held that because of the seriousness of the offence, the ground of upset to the legal order remained and that there was a risk of reoffending, because the report of the probation and social rehabilitation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222221

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2022

7 décembre 2022

The Athens Administrative Court of Appeal declared the appeals inadmissible because the applicants did not pay, as set out in the law: i) the court fees, calculated as a 2% of the value of the dispute

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-226180

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2023

7 juillet 2023

The assets were considered proceeds of crime because of the applicant’s criminal conviction, and seeing that he had not proved sufficient lawful income to rebut the statutory presumption on their criminal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-234559

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2024

28 mai 2024

The applicant complained about the lack of impartiality of the judge sitting in a single judge formation at the Timiș District Court, because in November 2020, the judge allegedly made prejudicial remarks

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222853

Admin. suprême

4 janvier 2023

4 janvier 2023

If so, has there been a violation of the applicants’ right to a fair hearing guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention because of a manifest error by the High Administrative Court or because the reasons

Source officielle

Page 74 sur 1597

← PrécédentSuivant →