Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 104, 192-196, ECHR 2005 ‑ IV; Ramirez Sanchez v.   France [GC], no. 59450/00, §§ 115-116, ECHR 2006 ‑ IX; and Finogenov and Others v.

Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 104, 192-196, ECHR 2005 ‑ IV; Ramirez Sanchez v.   France [GC], no. 59450/00, §§   115 ‑ 116, ECHR 2006 ‑ IX; and Finogenov and Others v.

Lodged on Applicant name date of birth place of residence Represented by   67374/11 12/09/2011 Tofig YAGUBLU 06/02/1961 Baku   Akif ALIZADE   612/12 14/12/2011 Ramiz AHADOV 22/07/1954 Baku

  Russia, nos. 78638/11 and 3 others, §§ 77-93, 19   January 2021). 3,000   15187/21 11/02/2021 Ramiz Fugarat ogly GASHIMOV 1985 SIZO-1 Komi Republic;   SIZO-2 Komi Republic;  

  Ramiro Da Luz Domingues Ferreira («   le requérant   »), a saisi la Cour le 27 janvier 1999 en vertu de l'article 34 de la Convention de sauvegarde des Droits de l'Homme et des Libertés

2020;   Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings 4,000   52353/21 05/08/2021 Khristina Dzhonson RAMIRES

Elle répétait       sans cesse les mots "j'ai peur", "ne me ramenez pas là", "ne me       battez pas" et affirmait que les membres de la commission de

there had been “no violation” in respect of the aforesaid complaint (see paragraph 62 above), an “arguable claim” clearly arises for the purpose of Article 13 of the Convention (see, mutatis mutandis , Ramirez

Ramirez [1974] 418 US 24); and to Canadian precedents, in particular the Canadian Supreme Court which in the case of Sauvé v.

  Bulgaria , § 135, 28 October 1998, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1998 ‑ VIII; Kudła , cited above, § 94 and Ramirez Sanchez v.

Poland , no. 20071/07, 17 April 2012; Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom , nos. 24027/07 and 4 others, 10 April 2012; Van der Ven v. the Netherlands , no. 50901/99, ECHR 2003 ‑ II; and Ramirez

States parties to the Convention more stringent security measures, which are intended to prevent the risk of escape, attack or disturbance of the prison community, exist for dangerous prisoners (see Ramirez

  31143/96, §   30, 18   October 2001, and Ramirez Sanchez v.   France [GC], no.   59450/00, §§   115-116, 4   July 2006). 54.

In the Court’s view, such limitations were analogous to those in Ramirez Sanchez v. France ([GC], no. 59450/00, §§ 131-135 ECHR 2006 ‑ IX), Öcalan v.

  the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 69, ECHR 1999 ‑ IX; Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, § 116, ECHR 2006 ‑ IX; Saadi v.

France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V; Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no. 59450/00, § 116, ECHR 2006-IX; and Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 87, ECHR 2010). 59.

  54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 ‑ IX; Ramirez Sanchez v. France [GC], no.   59450/00, § 117, ECHR 2006 ‑ IX; and Gäfgen , cited above, § 92). 83.

  54810/00, § 67, ECHR 2006 IX; Ramirez Sanchez , cited above, § 117; Gäfgen , cited above, § 92; and Bouyid , cited above, § 82). 48.

be to the effect that a complaint to the MADEKKI is to be seen as a preventive remedy, in other words, as a remedy that could have prevented the alleged violation from occurring or continuing (see Ramirez