CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
1ère Chambre
DTA_2200517_20230328
28 mars 2023
H et Mme I, pour la " régularisation et la transformation d'une maison d'habitation en boutique et en Beach restaurant " sur les parcelles n° 40 et 257 BD (Terre Tairineneva, parcelle C partie lot et remblai
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1021JUD002177302
21 octobre 2008
    On 18 June 1999 the Constitution was amended and the military judge sitting on the bench of the Istanbul State Security Court was replaced by a civilian judge. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0729JUD007756201
29 juillet 2004
They underlined that there were no elements to call into question the personal impartiality of the judges composing the bench of the Court of Appeal.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC003154002
1 juin 2006
Article 6 §§ 1, 2 and 3 (d) of the Convention, the applicant maintains that he did not receive a fair trial by an independent and impartial tribunal due to the presence of the military judge on the bench
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111808
4 juin 2012
On 2 April 2004 the main hearing started anew due to changes to the composition of the bench.
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1870036-1963645
13 décembre 2006
Mr July also complained, under Article 6 § 1 (right to a fair trial), that he was not heard by an independent court, as two out of the three judges on the bench of the Paris Court of Appeal which ruled
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1118DEC002137704
18 novembre 2008
The applicant further contended under Article 6 § 1 that he had not been tried by an independent and impartial tribunal on account of the presence of military judges on the bench of the military courts
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0707DEC002207703
7 juillet 2007
applicant further complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he had been denied a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0323DEC004028298
23 mars 1999
On that date, the District Court, having observed that its bench was composed of judges other than those who had sat at he previous hearings and that the accused refused to have the trial minutes read
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1118DEC003871404
The applicant further maintained under the same head that he had not received a fair trial by an independent and impartial tribunal due to the existence of a military judge on the bench of the state security
Tribunal Administratif de Montpellier
DTA_2501909_20250408
8 avril 2025
janvier 2025 par laquelle le maire de Valras-Plage s'est opposé à la déclaration préalable déposée par les requérantes le 23 décembre 2024, relative à la construction sur le toit de la résidence casino Beach
2ème Chambre
DCA_20NT01712_20220415
15 avril 2022
par ailleurs de l'annexe à cette décision, ainsi que d'une seconde décision du 24 février 2011 actualisant l'identification des sites de Normandie, que les sites autorisés comprennent celui d'Omaha Beach
5ème Chambre
DTA_2201350_20230711
11 juillet 2023
Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 10 mars 2022, Mme C E, représentée par Me Benac, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler la décision du 9 juin 2021 par laquelle le préfet de la
Juge des référés
ORCA_25BX00137_20250625
25 juin 2025
escaliers en bois d'une emprise au sol de 5 mètres carrés entravant le passage d'usagers du domaine public maritime, et pour avoir disposé, au bénéfice des clients de l'établissement " Java restaurant Beach
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0831DEC002186502
31 août 2006
The applicant submits under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that he was denied a fair hearing on account of the presence of a military judge on the bench of the State Security Courts, which tried and convicted
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-14264
14 décembre 2023
One of the new judges and replacements of the other two (who had passed away in the meantime) had been on the bench of the Constitutional Court which had issued the 2020 ruling.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1012JUD001372306
12 octobre 2017
During the oral hearing, the applicant challenged the above-mentioned three members of the bench – Mr K.K., Mr G.Ch. and Mr I.K – on the ground that they had considered his case when it had come before
2ème Chambre civile
68e897f96d821fc8a3c656a6
9 octobre 2025
Le Beach hôtel est classé dans la catégorie 4 étoiles, la décision d'Atout France visant les articles D311-4 à D311-8 du code du tourisme relatifs aux hôtels.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD006023711
13 juin 2023
The application further pertains to the alleged lack of independence and impartiality of the trial court owing to the fact that a criminal complaint had been lodged by the bench of that court against the
1re Chambre A
6034c0044dbd40ab1d427ddb
4 octobre 2016
rappeler que les parties sont signataires de plusieurs actes sous seing privé en date du 15 avril 2010, dont l'un porte sur la cession de droits immobiliers dans l'ensemble immobilier dénommé RIVIERA BEACH
Page 76 sur 226