Judgment of the Court of 24 February 1988.#European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium.#Case C-260/86.

Judgment of the Court of 9 June 1992.#Jean Lestelle v European Commission.#Case C-30/91 P.

The first hearing was held by the Słupsk Regional Court ( Sąd Okręgowy) on 17 March 2008. In the course of the judicial proceedings the applicant’s detention was continuously prolonged.

  Both parties appealed and on 10 February 2004 the Administrative Court of Appeal reversed the Administrative Court’s judgment.

Premier président de la cour d'appel de Versailles à sa demande de communication des documents suivants : 1) le contrat conclu le 2 septembre 2010 entre la cour d'appel de Versailles et la société DALLOZ

The applicant complains under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that his right of access to a court was breached on account of the absence of an avenue to challenge the Constitutional Court’s finding that

The Svea Court of Appeal upheld the District Court’s decision.   The applicant complained that the courts had failed to provide due protection for his name and reputation.

Damage caused in the course of the administration of justice is to be compensated if the judge’s guilt is established by a court judgment.

The Court of First Instance found against it, but the Court of Appeal overturned that decision and ordered the INPI to refuse to register “Budweiser” as a trade mark.

    As regards the applicant’s complaints about the Tribunal’s taking of evidence and the Administrative Court’s decision only to entertain part of his complaint, the Court recalls that, as a

    On 7 September 1994 the Bratislava I District Court discontinued the proceedings concerning the action brought by the Tesla company and the counter-action filed by A.

In the present cases, the Court of Appeal had failed to apply fully this Court's ruling in Lucà .

  297 of 26   April 2018 of the Constitutional Court .

According to the Government, the District Court's decision should be read in conjunction with the judgment of the Supreme Court; this judgment, the Government submitted, clarified the District Court's

He appeared at subsequent court hearings in Poland and ultimately obtained the court’s agreement for the proceedings to continue in his absence.

  The Court also decided to carry out fact-finding missions in both countries as soon as possible (see press release no. 455) in order to take evidence from the applicants who had been extradited

However, the relevant letter of the Court, sent through the Court’s Electronic Communication Service (eComms), was not downloaded by the applicant.

The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the district court.

influence on court's assessment of the facts.

to the domestic law and the Court’s case-law, the Government considered that the Constitutional Court represented an effective remedy. 31.