Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-593770-598214
25 juillet 2002
25 juillet 2002
It held 49% of the shares in a Ukrainian public company, Sovtransavto-Lougansk.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-635861-641350
15 octobre 2002
15 octobre 2002
Accordingly, the Court held that the seizure was not necessary in a democratic society.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-664715-671208
5 décembre 2002
5 décembre 2002
The Court accordingly held that there had been no violation of Article 6 under that head.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68482-68950
4 mai 2000
4 mai 2000
On 19 January 2000 the Grand Chamber held a public hearing.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1261420-1322801
17 février 2005
17 février 2005
It further held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 13.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68425-68893
8 juillet 1999
8 juillet 1999
23657/94), the European Court of Human Rights held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 2 (right to life) of the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of the death of
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1945992-2044692
2 mars 2007
2 mars 2007
In a judgment of 2 July 2002 it held that Poland should return the property to the applicant or pay him 60,500 euros (EUR) in respect of pecuniary damage for depriving him of it.
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3199449-3570212
16 juillet 2010
16 juillet 2010
Turkey (no. 37546/02) In a judgment of 8 April 2008, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1057519-1094934
27 juillet 2004
27 juillet 2004
A public hearing on the admissibility and merits was held in the Human Rights Building, Strasbourg, on 1 July 2003.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-433026-433646
16 octobre 2001
16 octobre 2001
He was held in Castlereagh Detention Centre, a holding centre for terrorist investigations in Belfast, for six days and 13 hours, where he was questioned by the police without making any reply.
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3247689-3627199
6 septembre 2010
6 septembre 2010
In judgments of 20 October 2009 and 10 March 2009, the Court held that there had been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-695892-703603
6 février 2003
6 février 2003
It held that the offences with which the applicant had been charged were not political or military in nature but ordinary criminal offences.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1555877-1633314
17 janvier 2006
17 janvier 2006
Accordingly, the Court held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3203969-3574237
22 juillet 2010
22 juillet 2010
The proceedings are still pending and no hearing has yet been held in his case. Rokosz v.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1023641-1058538
15 juin 2004
15 juin 2004
Accordingly, it held unanimously that there had not been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention. (The judgment is available only in French.)
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1572577-1649026
31 janvier 2006
31 janvier 2006
It accordingly held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-879462-903015
27 novembre 2003
27 novembre 2003
Accordingly, the Court held unanimously in all six cases that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.
Source officielleCour d'Appel
6253caf9bd3db21cbdd8c941
14 novembre 2008
14 novembre 2008
HELLO PARIS agissant poursuites et diligences en la personne de son Gérant ayant son siège 70 à 88, avenue Henri Barbusse 93000 BOBIGNY représentée par la SCP HARDOUIN, avoués à la Cour, assistée
Source officielleciv3
6137245fcd58014677414f63
8 février 2005
8 février 2005
Attendu que la décision de sursis à statuer rendue en dernier ressort ne peut être attaquée par la voie du pourvoi en cassation que pour violation de la règle de droit ; Attendu que la société Hélios
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Nancy
ORTA_2402306_20250124
24 janvier 2025
24 janvier 2025
A B et la société Helio Finance Réunion, représentés par Me Pitcher, demandent au tribunal : 1°) de condamner l'Agence nationale de l'habitat (ANAH) à verser à la société Helio Finance Réunion la somme
Source officiellePage 77 sur 2440