Company K thus lost a   substantial component of its operations. 3.

The deceased only lost consciousness when his breathing was disrupted by inhaling massive amounts of gastric contents.

    The Government submitted an objection for the first time ‑ to the effect that the applicants had lost victim status as a result of the Constitutional Court’s judgment in their favour

    The Government refused to settle the case arguing that the applicant had lost his victim status. The Court therefore decided to resume examination of the present case. THE FACTS I.

    The Court notes that, in the present case, the applicant companies lost opportunities on the market because of the legislative interference in question.

private business; and (iii) EUR 33,000 in respect of alleged lost opportunities to study for a Master's degree.

In the court’s view, the dog handler had carried out his duties properly and there were no grounds to find that any important evidence had been lost because of his actions. 29 .

PARIS [Numéro identifiant 8]) né le [Date naissance 3] 1952 à [Localité 22] (EGYPTE) de nationalité Française [Adresse 6] [Localité 14] représenté par Maître Jean-michel LECLERCQ-LEROY de la SELARL LOUETTE-LECLERCQ

If you then abandoned the application that time would be lost, but only that time. If, however, you renewed the application to a Court of three Judges they might direct that you lost more time.

00576) prise en son établissement CENTRE DE CONTROLE TECHNIQUE AUTOVISION PL situé [Adresse 16] à [Localité 10] [Adresse 1] [Localité 9] représentée par Maître Jean-michel LECLERCQ-LEROY de la SELARL LOUETTE-LECLERCQ

[X] [S] [Adresse 3] [Localité 1] représenté par Maître Hervé DUTEL de la SELARL LOUIT & ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau d’AIX-EN-PROVENCE Vu les articles 780 et suivants du Code de Procédure Civile, Ouï

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE D'AMIENS DU VINGT NEUF MARS DEUX MILLE VINGT ET UN PARTIES EN CAUSE : Monsieur [O] [Z] [Adresse 1] [Localité 4] Représenté par Me Jean-Michel LECLERCQ-LEROY de la SELARL LOUETTE-LECLERCQ

D'AMIENS EN DATE DU 11 AVRIL 2022 PARTIES EN CAUSE : APPELANTE Madame [N] [P] épouse [V] [Adresse 2] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me Jean-michel LECLERCQ-LEROY de la SELARL LOUETTE-LECLERCQ

With regard to the judgment of 2 February 1998, they argued that the applicant had lost his status as a victim, because the authorities had recognised a breach and provided redress (the award of 18 November

during the proceedings he submitted a statement of 13   October   1994 by a medical expert, to whom the applicant had explained that, on the day of the accident, he slipped on the greasy floor, lost

  COMPLAINTS         The applicant complains under Article 2 of the Convention that his right to life was breached in that he lost an entitlement to medical care in the

    COMPLAINTS         The applicant complains under Article 2 of the Convention that his right to life was breached in that he lost an entitlement to medical care

Criticising the lack of an effective mechanism to establish the circumstances in which his son had lost his life, he complained that the inadequate nature of the inquiry into his death had prevented him

It struck a balance between the interests of those whose property had been confiscated without compensation in the past and the persons who had lost cases brought against them under section 7 of the Restitution