Most of the delay in the proceedings could not be attributed to Mr Rumpf.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains about the delays in the criminal proceedings against the individuals who raped her or participated thereat.

of 1.5 months while the obligatory 6-month review took place with a delay of 8 days. 4,200   3683/21 07/01/2021 Torres Silva WAGNER 1997 Kiss Dániel Bálint Budapest 30/11/2018 to 18/11/2020 1 year

Russia (dec.), no. 14330/07, 5   February 2009, in which the enforcement delays of less than one year were found compatible with the Convention requirements). 21.

The Constitutional Court ordered the Bratislava Regional Court to proceed with the case without further delay.

    Remedies for delays in civil proceedings 20.

there was any inordinate or inexcusable delay in serving summonses on them.

This undoubtedly amounted to an unreasonable delay under Article 6 of the Convention. Moreover, there was no valid reason justifying the delay in paying compensation for the expropriation.

It claimed EUR   415,353 for the alleged delay in civil action no. 4099/2004 and EUR 800,551 for the alleged delay in appeal no. 28/2011.

The court dealt summarily with the issue of delay.

But, one has to see in an individual case what has been the cause of the delay.

le siège social est sis [Adresse 11] représentée par Maître Eric CESAR de la SELARL LEGI AVOCATS, avocats au barreau de LYON Compagnie d’assurance MMA IARD ès-qualités d’assureur de la société DELANNOY

    The applicant maintained his complaint concerning the delay in the enforcement of the judgment. 15.

insofar as this delay had exceeded six months.

There was then an 8 month delay before that was produced (delay not of Mr King's making). The appeal was launched on 17 August 1992. Judgment was given on 14 January 1994.

la société SCE, dont le siège social est sis [Adresse 5] non comparante, ni représentée DEFENDERESSES * * * * Magistrat : Madame CARDONA, Greffier : Madame BOIVIN lors des débats et Madame DELAFOY

INTIME : Monsieur [V] [D] [Adresse 3] [Localité 2] Représenté par Me Pierre BLIN, avocat au barreau de LISIEUX DEBATS : A l'audience publique du 27 octobre 2025, tenue par Mme DELAHAYE

Monsieur [O] [F] [Adresse 7] [Localité 3] Représenté par Me Vanessa LEMARECHAL, avocat au barreau de LISIEUX DEBATS : A l'audience publique du 29 janvier 2024, tenue par Mme DELAHAYE

né le [Date naissance 1] 1951 à [Localité 1] et Mme [B] [C] née le [Date naissance 2] 1967 à [Localité 2] demeurant ensemble [Adresse 2] [Adresse 2] représentés et assistés par Me Sylvie Delannoy-Vandecasteele