CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

312 résultats pour « Anne RAVISE-BES »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD000409713

Admin. suprême

15 janvier 2015

15 janvier 2015

They were not to establish anew whether the child’s return would be contrary to her best interests.

Page 8 sur 16

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164611

Admin. suprême

8 juin 2016

8 juin 2016

On 25   April 2006 experts issued a report on S.V.’s psychological state ante mortem .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC004689707

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2010

18 mai 2010

An alien on whom an exclusion order has been imposed cannot be lawfully resident in the Netherlands. 34.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130JUD004315505

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2010

30 novembre 2010

that may be, would have with the second applicant would be in the child's best interests.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD001873409

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2013

14 mars 2013

The Government pointed out that the examination of the facts by the District Court had to be viewed from an ex ante perspective.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622DEC005006808

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2010

22 juin 2010

Thus, in conclusion, he could not be granted leave to remain in Sweden and he was to be deported to the West Bank. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0303DEC004086406

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2009

3 mars 2009

The market value of the first property was found to be AMD   182,000,000 (approximately EUR 335,236) and that of the second property was found to be 11,391,000 (approximately EUR 20,981).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1119JUD002964807

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2020

19 novembre 2020

would be.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1115DEC004153498

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2005

15 novembre 2005

The Government argued that it was routine practice for witnesses to be called into the Regimental Sergeant Major’s office in this way so that the procedure to be followed at the hearing could be explained

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0531JUD001836406

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2012

31 mai 2012

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Grzywaczewski v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD002882502

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2014

10 juillet 2014

Letters containing information which may obstruct justice will not be dispatched, and the detainee must be informed accordingly. 55.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1205DEC003927298

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2002

5 décembre 2002

Further, an annex to the Statute of the International Criminal Court had stated that the coercion element of rape could be the result of “fear of violence, duress, detention, psychological oppression or

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1130DEC003161196

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2000

30 novembre 2000

), i.e. negligent defamation, to be distinguished from public defamation “despite better knowledge”, that is to say intentionally imputing an offence on T. whilst knowing that he had not committed it

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0717JUD002198405

Admin. suprême

17 juillet 2007

17 juillet 2007

It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Gorea v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0203JUD001661323

Admin. suprême

3 février 2026

3 février 2026

be “directly affected” by the disputed measure.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0225JUD006128021

Admin. suprême

25 février 2025

25 février 2025

Whether a second retrial should be permitted depends on an informed and dispassionate assessment of how the interests of justice in the widest sense are best served.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0529DEC001948809

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2012

29 mai 2012

In   September 2005 the Regional Court ordered a translation of the indictment to be served on the applicant. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928DEC001698702

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2010

28 septembre 2010

Proposals, submissions and complaints addressed to the prosecutor shall not be monitored and shall be dispatched within twenty-four hours (as worded at the material time). COMPLAINTS 28.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0421JUD003374006

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2009

21 avril 2009

Any such application shall be appointed for hearing with urgency and the application together with the date of the hearing shall be served on the same day of the application on the applicant and on the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002800508

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2013

14 mars 2013

The Rules also contain recommendations stating that accessible, informative and supportive counselling should be available before and after HIV-testing (annex 28 to paragraph 4.3.4). 84.

Source officielle