Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Saïdi

It had heard in this respect the employer of O. who confirmed that O. was not a liar. Finally it was stated that O. had not had any homosexual experiences before.

May, 1955, from the Registrar of the said Court he was informed that, insofar as the children had been baptised Roman Catholics and had been brought up as such, they should continue to be educated in the

P. averred that he had transported sand from a warehouse of the Stroyinvest company.

He said that the “mental Lahee patient” (a reference to Mr Powell) had killed Mr Seymour.

    The applicant Said Pourmola Borazan claimed that since the incident, he had been seriously affected and had attempted to commit suicide on several occasions.

He said he had not been present when the applicant’s husband had been taken. 16.

Both X and Y confirmed that they had heard the shots but said they did not know who had fired them.

In the decision it was stated that, during the investigation, T. had been questioned and had said that on 4 May 2012 he had swung a metal bar to protect himself and it was possible that he had hit someone

The regional court rejected the appeal, holding that the things the applicant had said during the demonstration were irrelevant to the case because he had been fined solely for failing to give the authorities

He gave a description of the two men who had taken his son away and said that he and a neighbouring shop owner would be able to identify them if required.

expropriation of the said property because the compensation had not been paid in full.

The applicant complained that he had not had a fair trial before the Court of Cassation inasmuch as the said court had dismissed his action by relying on an incorrect finding.

At night, they had only one lamp lit. He said that every death row inmate had a cell of not less than 12 square metres.

Two of the other police officers questioned said that there had been nothing wrong with the boy when he was handed over to his father, and the third said that he had seen no one ill-treat the boy. 23.

A B, représenté par Me Hadj Said, demande au tribunal d'annuler l'arrêté du 13 mai 2025 par lequel le préfet des Hauts-de-Seine l'a obligé à quitter le territoire français sans délai pour rejoindre le

In the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Court could not reverse the findings of the domestic courts, which had examined the extradition request in adversarial proceedings and had been able

The said court heard several witnesses. One of the witnesses testified inter alia that his relative, A.S., had heard P. stating that he had beaten an individual.

He also said that when he had tried to put some questions to a serviceman from the commander’s office he had been threatened.