CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

30 698 résultats pour « Marc LENOTRE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0303DEC002869206

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2009

3 mars 2009

  Italy [GC], no. 36813/97, 29 March 2006; Riccardi Pizzati v. Italy [GC], no. 62361/00, 29 March 2006; Musci v. Italy [GC], no. 64699/01, 29 March 2006; Giuseppe Mostacciuolo v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC002746605

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2012

11 septembre 2012

of proceedings) Art. 13 (lack of effective remedies in respect of length) Art. 1 of Protocol No. 1 (impact of length on property rights) 28 March 2012 6 July 2012 6,100 5. 19058/08 07/02/2008 Valeriy

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC003304603

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2010

12 janvier 2010

Poland , no. 52495/99, 28 March 2006. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD001242210

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2013

5 décembre 2013

It follows that in the period between 15 March 2002 and 28 December 2005 the applicants could have lodged a constitutional complaint to complain about the length of proceedings in their part before the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0507DEC001645821

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2026

7 mai 2026

above application against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 17   March

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175012

Admin. suprême

9 juin 2017

9 juin 2017

2015 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the length of the criminal proceedings against the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0916DEC006604601

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2004

16 septembre 2004

In March 1990 the applicant withdrew the mandate from his counsel. On 26 March 1990 the applicant's new counsel extended the action.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0203DEC000429003

Admin. suprême

3 février 2009

3 février 2009

In March and April 2001 it reminded the applicant to submit his further observations.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0128JUD002184608

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2010

28 janvier 2010

Croatia , no. 26455/04, 6   March 2008, and Medić v. Croatia , no. 49916/07, 26 March 2009).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC003455006

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2017

21 novembre 2017

Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 19-26, 26 March 2013). COMPLAINTS 8.     The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention that the length of the proceedings had been excessive. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1130DEC001890591

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 1994

30 novembre 1994

of the length of the proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0313JUD007299910

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2014

13 mars 2014

  24549/03, 1 March 2005).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1121DEC004945599

Admin. suprême

21 novembre 2000

21 novembre 2000

On 18   March 1997 the District Court dismissed the applicant’s motions. On 28 March 1997 the applicant appealed from this decision and filed a motion challenging the judge for bias.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0529DEC003321807

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2018

29 mai 2018

The applicant was released on 6 March 2010. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6566

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 1999

21 septembre 1999

After making a number of unsuccessful applications for his release pending trial, he lodged a complaint with the Commission about the length of his imprisonment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249569

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2026

13 mars 2026

2026   THIRD SECTION Application no. 36194/24 Arif HASANOV against Azerbaijan lodged on 22 November 2024 communicated on 13 March 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The present case concerns the length

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6749

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2000

28 mars 2000

Italy - 38045/97 Judgment 28.3.2000 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of criminal proceedings: friendly settlement The case concerns the length of criminal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0323DEC004042898

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2000

23 mars 2000

The judge adjourned until 21   March 1988 and extended the period until the end of April 1988. On 21 March 1988 the lawyers applied for an adjournment.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-247950

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2025

10 décembre 2025

The applicant complains about the length of the proceedings which lasted six years and five months over two levels of jurisdiction. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-141201

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2014

24 janvier 2014

He submitted that the appellate proceedings had lasted from 30 December 2009 until 2 March 2011 and that the excessive length of the proceedings was attributable to the domestic authorities, in particular

Source officielle

Page 8 sur 1535

← PrécédentSuivant →