CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0303DEC002869206
3 mars 2009
  Italy [GC], no. 36813/97, 29 March 2006; Riccardi Pizzati v. Italy [GC], no. 62361/00, 29 March 2006; Musci v. Italy [GC], no. 64699/01, 29 March 2006; Giuseppe Mostacciuolo v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC002746605
11 septembre 2012
of proceedings) Art. 13 (lack of effective remedies in respect of length) Art. 1 of Protocol No. 1 (impact of length on property rights) 28 March 2012 6 July 2012 6,100 5. 19058/08 07/02/2008 Valeriy
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC003304603
12 janvier 2010
Poland , no. 52495/99, 28 March 2006. 2.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD001242210
5 décembre 2013
It follows that in the period between 15 March 2002 and 28 December 2005 the applicants could have lodged a constitutional complaint to complain about the length of proceedings in their part before the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0507DEC001645821
7 mai 2026
above application against the Republic of Poland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 17   March
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-175012
9 juin 2017
2015 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the length of the criminal proceedings against the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0916DEC006604601
16 septembre 2004
In March 1990 the applicant withdrew the mandate from his counsel. On 26 March 1990 the applicant's new counsel extended the action.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0203DEC000429003
3 février 2009
In March and April 2001 it reminded the applicant to submit his further observations.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0128JUD002184608
28 janvier 2010
Croatia , no. 26455/04, 6   March 2008, and Medić v. Croatia , no. 49916/07, 26 March 2009).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1121DEC003455006
21 novembre 2017
Turkey ((dec.), no. 4860/09, §§ 19-26, 26 March 2013). COMPLAINTS 8.     The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention that the length of the proceedings had been excessive. 9.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1130DEC001890591
30 novembre 1994
of the length of the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0313JUD007299910
13 mars 2014
  24549/03, 1 March 2005).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1121DEC004945599
21 novembre 2000
On 18   March 1997 the District Court dismissed the applicant’s motions. On 28 March 1997 the applicant appealed from this decision and filed a motion challenging the judge for bias.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0529DEC003321807
29 mai 2018
The applicant was released on 6 March 2010. 12.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6566
21 septembre 1999
After making a number of unsuccessful applications for his release pending trial, he lodged a complaint with the Commission about the length of his imprisonment.
ECLI:CEDH:001-249569
13 mars 2026
2026   THIRD SECTION Application no. 36194/24 Arif HASANOV against Azerbaijan lodged on 22 November 2024 communicated on 13 March 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The present case concerns the length
ECLI:CEDH:002-6749
28 mars 2000
Italy - 38045/97 Judgment 28.3.2000 [Section II] Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 Reasonable time Length of criminal proceedings: friendly settlement The case concerns the length of criminal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0323DEC004042898
23 mars 2000
The judge adjourned until 21   March 1988 and extended the period until the end of April 1988. On 21 March 1988 the lawyers applied for an adjournment.
ECLI:CEDH:001-247950
10 décembre 2025
The applicant complains about the length of the proceedings which lasted six years and five months over two levels of jurisdiction. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
ECLI:CEDH:001-141201
24 janvier 2014
He submitted that the appellate proceedings had lasted from 30 December 2009 until 2 March 2011 and that the excessive length of the proceedings was attributable to the domestic authorities, in particular
Page 8 sur 1535