or dirty cell, overcrowding Art. 13 - lack of any effective remedy in domestic law in respect of inadequate conditions of detention during transport 1,000   23439/20 24/04/2020 Dmitriy Igorevich ZENIN

render the remedy ineffective, the six-month time-limit is calculated from the date when the applicant first became, or ought to have become, aware of those circumstances (see, among other authorities, Zenin

circumstances which render the remedy ineffective, the six-month time-limit is calculated from the date when the applicant first became, or ought to have become, aware of those circumstances (see, among others, Zenin

render the remedy ineffective, the six-month time ‑ limit is calculated from the date when the applicant first became, or ought to have become, aware of those circumstances (see, among others, Zenin

  Russia , no. 42371/02, § 70, 1 April 2010, and Zenin v. Russia (dec.), no.   15413/03, 24 September 2009). 66.

render the remedy ineffective, the six-month time ‑ limit is calculated from the date when the applicant first became, or ought to have become, aware of those circumstances (see, among others, Zenin

Sweden , no. 10491/83, Commission decision of 3   December 1986, Decisions and Reports (DR) 51, p. 41; Zénon Bernard v.

render the remedy ineffective, the six-month time ‑ limit is calculated from the date when the applicant first became, or ought to have become, aware of those circumstances (see, among others, Zenin

legal regime was created whereby tenants of State or municipality apartments could – provided that the conditions set forth in law had been fulfilled – privatise said apartments (for more details see Zentas

These witnesses were Stelios Archimandritis, Antigonos Kaoulla, Panicos Christodoulou Tylliros, Georghios Aresti, Zenon Tavrou, Michalis Andrea Neocleous, Stephanos Stephanou, Floros Adamou Constanti,

calculate the six-month time-limit from the date when the applicant first became or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Keenan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 27229/95, 22 May 1998, and Zenin

Italy , 7 August 1996, Reports 1996 ‑ III; Zentar v. France , no.   17902/02, 13 April 2006; and S.N. , cited above).

appropriate for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 to calculate the six-month time-limit from the date when the applicant first became, or ought to have become, aware of those circumstances (see, among others, Zenin

Zenin. The court delivered its judgment on 9 December 1993.

appropriate for the purposes of Article 35 § 1 to calculate the six-month time-limit from the date when the applicant first became or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see, among others, Zenin

These witnesses were Stelios Archimandritis, Antigonos Kaoulla, Panicos   Christodoulou Tylliros, Georghios Aresti, Zenon Tavrou, Michalis   Andrea Neocleous, Stephanos Stephanou, Floros &#xa0

render the remedy ineffective, the six-month time ‑ limit is calculated from the date when the applicant first became, or ought to have become, aware of those circumstances (see, among others, Zenin

Sweden , no. 34209/96, § 45, ECHR 2002 ‑ V; and, more recently, Zentar v. France , no.   17902/02, 13 April 2006; Gossa v. Poland , no. 47986/99, 9 January 2007; Mirilashvili v.