CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

12 110 résultats pour « Favot »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224012

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2023

8 mars 2023

inefficiency of the Cypriot authorities in swiftly and diligently enforcing the orders and in making all efforts necessary to reunite her with her children, according to the Family Court’s orders in her favour

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217874

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2022

11 mai 2022

In 2014 the Supreme Court of Justice reversed the judgments issued by lower courts in the applicant company’s favour and rejected its appeal in a final decision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178165

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2017

25 septembre 2017

The application concerns the criminal proceedings brought against the applicant for disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK under section   7 § 2 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213DEC000601508

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2011

13 décembre 2011

The applicant company complained under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the non-enforcement of a number of domestic judgments given in its favour.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10103

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 1995

27 septembre 1995

  As regards imposition of sanctions, new provisions applied retrospectively, but this operated in applicant's favour as he benefited from downgrading of offence from serious offence (crime) to less

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622DEC000802409

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2010

22 juin 2010

The applicant complained about non-enforcement of several judgments in its favour. On 25 January 2010 the application was communicated to the Government for information.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6546

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 1999

22 juillet 1999

The arbitrator found in favour of the plaintiff. The applicant sought to have the award set aside; after a hearing in private, the application was refused.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193945

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2019

23 mai 2019

If so, has there been a violation of that Article on account of the non-enforcement of administrative court decisions in the applicant’s favour (see Kyrtatos v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209982

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2021

16 avril 2021

By a judgment of 16 July 2009, the first instance court found in favour of the applicant, ordering the third parties to pay him around 55,000 euros (EUR) plus interest.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242816

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2025

19 mars 2025

Relying on Article 6 of the Convention and on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, he also complains that the binding and enforceable court judgment in his favour has not been executed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249594

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2026

9 mars 2026

On 13 December 2023 the Tbilisi City Court ruled in favour of the bank, granting its request for the forced sale of the applicant’s encumbered property in relation to a defaulted loan.

Source officielle
TJ

JLD

686831cd4965b5d9df321370

T. Judiciaire

4 juillet 2025

4 juillet 2025

Localité 3], demeurant [Adresse 1] (bénéficie d’une aide juridictionnelle Totale numéro du 04/07/2025 accordée par le bureau d’aide juridictionnelle de [Localité 2]) non comparant, représenté par Me Inès FAGOT

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;FORTHCOMINGHEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2784708-3045482

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2009

26 juin 2009

  On 27 January 2009 the Chamber to which the case had been allocated relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber under Article 30 of the Convention.

Source officielle
TA

1ère chambre

DTA_2101031_20230525

Administratif

25 mai 2023

25 mai 2023

Le 26 octobre 2020, la SAS A Cala di Luna a déposé en mairie de Conca une demande de permis de construire un ensemble hôtelier sur la parcelle cadastrée section B n°1128, lieudit " Favone ".

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-198422

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2019

17 octobre 2019

The first and second instance courts applied the principle of presumption of service and – without the applicant’s participation in the proceedings – rendered judgments in favour of the plaintiff.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1218JUD003542507

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2018

18 décembre 2018

    Judgments in the applicant’s favour against various State authorities 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0118JUD006952401

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2007

18 janvier 2007

The law contained an equivocal term, and each opposing party – pensioners and pension agencies – read it in their own favour.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0929JUD002340503

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2005

29 septembre 2005

    The respondent Government did not provide any explanation as to why the judgment in the applicant’s favour has not been enforced.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173322

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2017

3 avril 2017

  1 to the Convention about the non-enforcement of the judgments in their favour against the OAO specified in Appendix   I.   ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD004332702

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2010

1 avril 2010

    The applicant complained that the quashing of the final judgment in her favour violated her right to a court as provided in Article 6 of the Convention.

Source officielle

Page 80 sur 606

← PrécédentSuivant →