He consequently objected to the Government’s submission that he should have challenged the prejudicial media coverage of the Regional Court’s judgment before the civil courts.

court hearings.

of the proceedings before the Court.

On 29 May 1995, the District Court found the applicant guilty on one count of aggravated fraud and debtor’s dishonesty.

    The Court’s assessment 47.     The Court sees no reason not to apply the principles set out in James, Wells and Lee , cited above, to the facts of the present case. 48.

Ces deux textes retiennent une courte prescription uniforme de cinq ans.

In giving the judgment of the Court, the Vice-President, Lord Justice Rose, observed that during the course of argument, the court had indicated that: “... we concluded that the compelled answers should

On 22 December 2011 the Court of Cassation quashed the District Court’s decision of 8 August 2006, and the decision of the Court of Appeal of 31 August 2011, and remitted the case to the District Court

    On 24 September 2021 the first-instance court rejected the monastery’s application and allowed F.’s counter-application.

The court limited the grounds of his detention to the risk of reoffending, because the trial court had already heard all witnesses.

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE PARIS [1] [1] Copie conforme délivrée le : à : Maître Sophie MÉNIGOZ Maître Claudine MIMRAN Préfecture Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Maître Didier Jacques DAILLOUX

He referred to the finding of the minority of the Supreme Court in respect of count 3).

Moreover, it found that the Assize Court’s account of the relevant adjournments had been inaccurate: while the court itself had been responsible for a number of them, the applicant had not objected and

During the trial, the Assize Court examined various witnesses and questioned experts.

This situation cannot be compared with the case of ongoing proceedings, where the courts must ensure that they follow the proper course by, for example, acting attentively when asked to agree to a request

10/07/2014 sued by the claimant in the course of the proceedings 11.08 300 8 Ms Mária JURÍČKOVÁ 1925 Košice 02/08/2004   (the first instance court assessed her date of entry in the proceedings on

    On 6 October 2008 the Starachowice District Court gave judgment and convicted the applicant of numerous counts of car theft, several counts of extortion, forgery of documents and escaping

On 5   January 2011 the 10 th Chamber of the Istanbul Assize Court dismissed his request. On 17 January 2011 the applicant challenged the Assize Court’s refusal.

  Since the beginning of the 1990s Princess Caroline von Hannover has been campaigning – often through the courts – in various European countries to prevent photographs about her private life being

On 10 July 2012 the Constitutional Court delivered its judgment, finding a violation of the applicant’s right to liberty on the grounds that the appellate court’s decision had been based on incomplete