CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD004361111
16 janvier 2014
concedes that converts who suffer persecution are unable to seek protection and redress from the authorities, acknowledging that on 22 September, 2010, the 11 th Circuit Criminal Court of Appeals for the Gilan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD008102817
8 juillet 2025
The Court thus considers that there was an element of coercion which was indicative of a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article   5 § 1 (see Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD003746304
1 avril 2010
On 1 February 2008 he was examined by an oncologist, who diagnosed him with a giant cavernous haemangioma of the head and stated that surgical treatment was not recommended because of the extent of the
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307DEC001154304
7 mars 2019
Palerme 26/11/2018     19118/11 10/03/2011 (5 requérants) Alberto GAROFALI 26/09/1935 Maria BONINO 22/04/1937 Patrizia GAROFALI 10/08/1962 Mauro GAROFALI 23/12/1963 Monica GAROFALI 09/04/1965 Gigante
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD002658707
26 juin 2014
  30194/09, 21 June 2011, in which the applicant spent forty-five minutes at the police station; Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0428JUD004290612
28 avril 2016
The Court further points out that Article 5 § 1 may apply to deprivations of liberty of a very short duration, where applicants are stopped for a search for a period not exceeding thirty minutes (see Gillan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0305JUD002871809
5 mars 2015
Consequently, the law must indicate with sufficient clarity the scope of any such discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise (see Gillan and Quinton v. the United
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0220JUD005871710
20 février 2020
stopped for the purposes of a search for a period which did not exceed thirty minutes during which they were entirely deprived of any freedom of movement and were obliged to remain where they were (see Gillan
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD002834911
19 octobre 2021
scope of any such discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise with sufficient clarity to give the individual adequate protection against arbitrary interference (see Gillan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124JUD001341803
24 janvier 2012
In view of the above circumstances, the Court finds that the applicant’s arrest and subsequent detention constituted a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (see Gillan and Quinton
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213JUD006106410
13 février 2018
    The Government submitted some statistical data for 2009-11 aimed at demonstrating (by contrast to the Court’s findings in Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom , no.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111190
18 janvier 2011
the European Court are closely focused on the facts of particular cases that “makes it perilous to transpose the outcome of one case to another where the facts are different” (per Lord Bingham in R (Gillan
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002346294
8 juillet 1999
, refusing this destiny imposed on them, and have now begun to take giant strides towards the accomplishment of their own destiny.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD004831110
10 juillet 2014
One particularly delicate matter is that on 11 April the Russian energy giant Gazprom and the German [company] BASF signed a memorandum in Hanover for the joint exploitation of a Russian gas field, in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0707JUD000432206
7 juillet 2016
Consequently, the law must indicate with sufficient clarity the scope of any such discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise (see, among other authorities, Gillan
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD003156613
17 janvier 2017
The president of that giant college of most reverend judges has had little power; [however,] ...
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-179757
7 décembre 2017
xa0;   DH(96)623 38487/97 CAVALLINI AND / ET GUALERSI     DH(99)378 25215/94 CAVIGLIA     DH(96)164 52915/99 CAZZATO 12/02/2002 12/05/2002   25249/94 CAZZORLA AND / ET GIGANTE
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179758
ECLI:CEDH:001-117778
22 septembre 2010
The interference with the appellant’s freedom of movement was not merely transitory, as in R (Gillan) v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2006] UKHL 12; [2006] 2 AC 307 where detention in the
Page 82 sur 82
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.