CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 639 résultats pour « Gilmant »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD004361111

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2014

16 janvier 2014

concedes that converts who suffer persecution are unable to seek protection and redress from the authorities, acknowledging that on 22 September, 2010, the 11 th Circuit Criminal Court of Appeals for the Gilan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD008102817

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

The Court thus considers that there was an element of coercion which was indicative of a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article   5 § 1 (see Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD003746304

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2010

1 avril 2010

On 1 February 2008 he was examined by an oncologist, who diagnosed him with a giant cavernous haemangioma of the head and stated that surgical treatment was not recommended because of the extent of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0307DEC001154304

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2019

7 mars 2019

Palerme 26/11/2018     19118/11 10/03/2011 (5 requérants) Alberto GAROFALI 26/09/1935 Maria BONINO 22/04/1937 Patrizia GAROFALI 10/08/1962 Mauro GAROFALI 23/12/1963 Monica GAROFALI 09/04/1965 Gigante

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0626JUD002658707

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2014

26 juin 2014

  30194/09, 21 June 2011, in which the applicant spent forty-five minutes at the police station; Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0428JUD004290612

Admin. suprême

28 avril 2016

28 avril 2016

The Court further points out that Article 5 § 1 may apply to deprivations of liberty of a very short duration, where applicants are stopped for a search for a period not exceeding thirty minutes (see Gillan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0305JUD002871809

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2015

5 mars 2015

Consequently, the law must indicate with sufficient clarity the scope of any such discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise (see Gillan and Quinton v. the United

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0220JUD005871710

Admin. suprême

20 février 2020

20 février 2020

stopped for the purposes of a search for a period which did not exceed thirty minutes during which they were entirely deprived of any freedom of movement and were obliged to remain where they were (see Gillan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1019JUD002834911

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2021

19 octobre 2021

scope of any such discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise with sufficient clarity to give the individual adequate protection against arbitrary interference (see Gillan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124JUD001341803

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

In view of the above circumstances, the Court finds that the applicant’s arrest and subsequent detention constituted a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 (see Gillan and Quinton

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213JUD006106410

Admin. suprême

13 février 2018

13 février 2018

    The Government submitted some statistical data for 2009-11 aimed at demonstrating (by contrast to the Court’s findings in Gillan and Quinton v. the United Kingdom , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-111190

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2011

18 janvier 2011

the European Court are closely focused on the facts of particular cases that “makes it perilous to transpose the outcome of one case to another where the facts are different” (per Lord Bingham in R (Gillan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002346294

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 1999

8 juillet 1999

, refusing this destiny imposed on them, and have now begun to take giant strides towards the accomplishment of their own destiny.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0710JUD004831110

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2014

10 juillet 2014

One particularly delicate matter is that on 11 April the Russian energy giant Gazprom and the German [company] BASF signed a memorandum in Hanover for the joint exploitation of a Russian gas field, in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0707JUD000432206

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2016

7 juillet 2016

Consequently, the law must indicate with sufficient clarity the scope of any such discretion conferred on the competent authorities and the manner of its exercise (see, among other authorities, Gillan

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD003156613

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2017

17 janvier 2017

The president of that giant college of most reverend judges has had little power; [however,] ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-179757

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2017

7 décembre 2017

xa0;   DH(96)623 38487/97 CAVALLINI AND / ET GUALERSI     DH(99)378 25215/94 CAVIGLIA     DH(96)164 52915/99 CAZZATO 12/02/2002 12/05/2002   25249/94 CAZZORLA AND / ET GIGANTE

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179758

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2017

7 décembre 2017

xa0;   DH(96)623 38487/97 CAVALLINI AND / ET GUALERSI     DH(99)378 25215/94 CAVIGLIA     DH(96)164 52915/99 CAZZATO 12/02/2002 12/05/2002   25249/94 CAZZORLA AND / ET GIGANTE

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-117778

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 2010

22 septembre 2010

The interference with the appellant’s freedom of movement was not merely transitory, as in R (Gillan) v Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2006] UKHL 12; [2006] 2 AC 307 where detention in the

Source officielle

Page 82 sur 82

← Précédent

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.