According to the applicant, they went there despite her objections.

The aim of this exercise was to find out whether the villagers knew them and whether Abdulvahap and his friend knew the villagers. To this end all the villagers were gathered in the village squares.

They submitted that they had been living in the flat since 1984 and had not been registered at another address after their registration there.

They do not dispute that the State has the right to have recourse to the surveillance measures contemplated by the legislation; they challenge this legislation in that it permits those measures without

I do not insist on calling these attesting witnesses, but if [the lawyers] consider this necessary, then I agree with them.

They argued that they had been living in the flat since 1992 as members of K.’s family and acquired the right to reside there.

    The applicants maintained that they had not waived their right to a   public hearing.

They were not informed of the nature of the operations and their consent was not sought.

Although this plan afforded the applicants the possibility of meeting with S. four times a year, they failed to contact the authorities to agree on the dates of the visits.

In any event, they cannot claim to be the victims of a violation of their rights under Articles 9 and 10, as they were acquitted of all charges against them by the above-mentioned judgment. 28.

  They requested that the Council provide them with a place to live and grant them an allowance for their living expenses.

The medical team informed the applicant why they were there and then entered the house, while the police officers remained at the front door. 11 .

    In addition, having lost the confidence of their suppliers, they had had to pay them cash, which had resulted in their having to resort to expensive borrowing from banks.

proceedings which could call into question the findings of fact of the Denizli Assize Court in their decision of 25 May 2003 and lead the Court to depart from them.

The Commissario della Legge confirmed their arrest, questioned them and then charged them with possession of and trafficking in drugs (the second applicant was also accused of illegal possession of a firearm

In this connection, they argued that there had been time gaps and interruptions in the video and requested that the trial court admits the original video material in evidence.

good. -- Tell them that HIV and AIDS appeared early with the homosexuals and that their promiscuous lifestyle was one of the main reasons for this modern-day plague gaining a foothold. -- Tell them that

In October 2008 the family had been told that their house had been seized by the persons who had searched for them. 8.

    Summary of the judgment [2]   Complaints   The applicants complained that their daughter had been taken from them and that there had thus been an interference in their family life