CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1022JUD003627502
22 octobre 2009
Il n'y avait pas de draps et le requérant dormait par terre. 42.
Page 83 sur 105
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0517JUD007136712
17 mai 2022
at [the club] and ... intentionally set [the club] on fire using fuel that they had brought with them ... they then escaped, having caused property damage in the amount of 3,227,563 Armenian drams
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0110REP001741990
10 janvier 1995
Amongst these provisions is the criminal law of blasphemy, as tested recently in the House of Lords in R v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0627REP002241493
27 juin 1995
Nor did he draw the same inferences as the applicants' solicitors from those reports. 40.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1217JUD001918791
17 décembre 1996
On 24 July 1991 leave to appeal was refused by the House of Lords. 3. The applicant’s appeal 38. The applicant applied for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002267893
9 juin 1998
the SS [3] decree and every [other] form of State terror, in İzmir they want to achieve the same aim by depriving our fellow citizens of their means of subsistence and in the end by knocking their houses
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1114JUD005258999
14 novembre 2006
However, this plan was not implemented and apparently the land was later designated for the construction of small individual houses. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1129JUD003423809
29 novembre 2016
The applicant and B.M. lived in a house which had been bought in their name but paid for by Dr M.S. The applicant’s husband worked part-time as Dr M.S.’s administrative assistant. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1023JUD000897902
23 octobre 2008
In thick fog a passenger car collided with the convoy and turned abruptly towards the houses. The soldiers started shooting and wounded the driver.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1001JUD001633218
1 octobre 2019
In 1998 a church was built on plot no. 996/1, 20.5 m away from the existing house in which the first applicant had lived with her family before the war.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708DEC005949409
8 juillet 2025
Proceedings before the House of Lords ( R v. Briggs-Price [2009] UKHL 19) 35.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108JUD003795611
8 janvier 2013
Thus, her mentally ill brother no longer lived in the same household but had been placed in an institution; the house had been partly renovated and heating had been installed. 12.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0112JUD001671705
12 janvier 2012
On the same date his house was allegedly searched without a warrant. 8. On 3 August 1999 the applicant signed a waiver of his right to legal representation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC004323198
13 novembre 2003
On 4 January 1997 the Sofia City Prosecutor’s Office refused to drop the charges, ordered additional investigative actions, and held that the applicant was to be indicted for both offences.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0314DEC004634799
14 mars 2005
In particular, she states that she owns half a share in a plot of land with buildings thereon, which consist of one shop, one flat and three houses.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0630REP001896991
30 juin 1993
payment, with one exception dispose of timber from the ward's forest, with one exception let his real property on lease for a shorter period than five years, and with some exceptions take out loans, draw
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0628JUD003153607
28 juin 2018
On 6 December 2006 the Prosecutor’s Office presented a handwritten letter from Ms N.’s neighbours dated 4 December 2006, according to which the witness had long abandoned her house
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918DEC002849003
18 septembre 2012
The question arose in the context of a case brought by a certain E.K., who sought damages for the nationalisation of her family’s printing house and, as one of the basis for her claim, invoked Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0626JUD000883820
26 juin 2025
On 10 December 2004 the bodies of two women, D. and S., were found in a village – in D.’s house – with numerous stab wounds.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0309DEC003688205
9 mars 2010
We have concluded that, from the viewpoint of that [domestic] jurisprudence, the wording of Paragraph 34 (9)(c) draws the line appropriately between what is and what is not acceptable conduct on behalf