On 10 February 1998 the criminal proceedings against the applicant were discontinued because his guilt had not been proven. 7.

    Three hearings listed for 7 and 21 May and 4 June 2002 did not take place because the Customs Agency had not been duly summoned. 28.

A hearing listed for 9 February 1996 failed to take place because the applicant was ill and could not attend and because the remaining witness was absent as well.

#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Milieu – Richtlijn 2001/42/EG – Beoordeling van de gevolgen voor het milieu van bepaalde plannen en programma’s – Artikel 2, onder a) – Begrip ‚plannen en programma’s’ – Artikel

d'aménagement et de réaménagement des lieux et équipements sanitaires, l'entretien et la maintenance de ces lieux et équipements, l'installation des boutiques proposant la vente de produits d'hygiène, de beauté

certes le rapporteur de la Commission supérieure des sites a fait état de la volonté d'éviter une telle spéculation, mais qu'il précisait immédiatement quelle était la finalité poursuivie, à savoir la beauté

que l'argumentation du prévenu, pas plus qu'elle n'a emporté la conviction du tribunal, ne saurait emporter celle de la Cour ; que le libellé du document litigieux comportant la mention "retrouvez beauté

Because of its total destruction, it is not possible to determine exactly why it broke.

She had not sought medical help or contacted the police because she could not get out of the flat. 55.

CAISSE PRIMAIRE D'ASSURANCE MALADIE DE VILLEFRANCHE-SUR-SAONE REPROCHE A L'ARRET ATTAQUE D'AVOIR QUALIFIE D'ACCIDENT DU TRAVAIL PROPREMENT DIT L'ACCIDENT DE LA CIRCULATION SURVENU LE 7 NOVEMBRE 1970 A BECART

The second had also applied in 2004 to benefit from the housing programme in Megara, but his application was turned down because the conditions required were not met.

He had been obliged to spend significant sums of money for the maintenance and improvement of the premises, because the competent public authorities had shown no interest.

Apparently, it was not possible to allot to him land in the area of Kalipetrovo, because all available forestry land there was situated in a protected territory. 10.

    On 16 December 2013 the Pula County Court dismissed an appeal by the applicant and upheld the first-instance judgment, which thereby became final. 13.

    Those courts held that the accident had occurred due to a failure in road maintenance and not because of a failure in road cleaning.

He had decided to perpetrate such an act because he was a displaced person, and because during the war he had lost his uncle and many other persons whom he had known.

This judgment became binding on 6 June 2002, but was not enforced immediately. 6.

He rejected the applicant's objections as inadmissible because he was not a neighbour within the meaning of section 25 of the Tyrolean Building Act ( Bauordnung ).

On that date the applicant asked for an adjournment because he was ill. The hearing was adjourned until 19 June 1990. On 19 June 1990 TOB failed to appear.