The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that he was deprived of his right to peacefully enjoy his property as the authorities expropriated his land without notifying him

This problem had never been an issue in his conversations with the applicant.

    On 2 February 2016 the new trial court noted that the applicant had failed to appear for his trial when summoned and his whereabouts were unknown.

  On 18 September the same judge dismissed his application, which had been opposed by his wife in submissions of 11 September.   16.

His numerous requests to be granted access to court and expert files and his contradictory requests regarding the commissioning of further expert opinions had also significantly contributed to render the

The Court committed the applicant to prison for 28 days on the basis, apparently, that his failure to pay was due to his culpable neglect.

his military passport.

his trial by court-martial in Germany (see paragraphs 19-20 above).

merits of his complaints under that provision.

He was found lying on his back with his legs crossed whereas, according to the expert opinion, a person who falls down from exhaustion should lie face down.

    Upon his release on 4 April 2005 the applicant stayed at his friend's flat in the town of Korolev, in the Moscow Region, awaiting examination of his asylum application. 26.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, ...

she had not seen the colour of his jacket. 11.

of his home.

Maître [Y] [O] entendu en ses observations : J’ai eu le document hier, je ne soutiens pas l’assignationà résidence.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, TROISIÈME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le premier moyen, ci-après annexé : Attendu que la cour d'appel, qui n'était pas tenue de répondre à un simple argument

    The applicant complained, in particular, that his employer’s decision to terminate his contract had been based on a breach of his right to respect for his private life and correspondence

Galperin, his successor in that office. 3.

Despite the fact that the applicant in that case was represented by his wife, the Court considered it relevant that his claim had been largely based on his personal experience and that his submissions

He was deprived of his legal capacity because it is difficult for him to manage his financial affairs. He requested a guardian himself.