CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 619 résultats pour « Isabel WERTER »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701DEC000783710

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2014

1 juillet 2014

    The proceedings were conducted before the Štip Court of First Instance (“the trial court”).

Page 84 sur 131

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1127JUD007580401

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2008

27 novembre 2008

The judges of the military courts were elected by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine for ten years. The candidates, on passing a competitive examination the first time, were elected for five years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD000039707

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2011

13 janvier 2011

    The applicants were represented by Mr L. Lennartz, a lawyer practising in Euskirchen. The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0116JUD000798809

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2014

16 janvier 2014

Also, a few privately owned weapon shops were attacked. According to the Government, there were over two hundred and fifty participants in the attack. 7 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1017JUD005499607

Admin. suprême

17 octobre 2013

17 octobre 2013

From 6   a.m. to 10 p.m. four 40-watt electric bulbs were used. For the rest of the time two 40-watt electric bulbs were used. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0417JUD002621607

Admin. suprême

17 avril 2014

17 avril 2014

Maintenance and repair charges were the same regardless of whether the flat was owned privately or by the State.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0226JUD004261702

Admin. suprême

26 février 2009

26 février 2009

    The applicants were represented by Ms S. Margaritova-Vuchkova, a lawyer practising in Sofia. The Bulgarian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Ms S.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1116DEC003027806

Admin. suprême

16 novembre 2010

16 novembre 2010

According to the applicants, these decisions were not challenged by the public prosecutor and accordingly were not reviewed by the Supreme Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0410JUD002082402

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2008

10 avril 2008

    Although the property and accounts of the military unit were frozen by the Leninskiy Bailiffs’ Service the funds obtained were insufficient for the payment of the amount due to the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123DEC001297709

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2010

23 novembre 2010

The German Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Deputy Agent, Mr H.-J. Behrens, Ministerialrat , of the Federal Ministry of Justice.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0602DEC002970505

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2009

2 juin 2009

The police investigation reports served on the applicant were not sufficient to ensure that he had a fair hearing, as the applicant had not been placed in a position to examine the evidence they were based

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013DEC003739508

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2009

13 octobre 2009

At the same time contact rights for the applicant were set.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC004205204

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2010

2 novembre 2010

Thus, the negative consequences of the proceedings before the first instance and the appeal courts were redressed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1208DEC005419307

Admin. suprême

8 décembre 2009

8 décembre 2009

The purchase agreements were signed before a notary, in accordance with the relevant German legislation. On the same dates charges were created on the properties.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD000930007

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2012

26 juin 2012

Both opinions were annexed to the judgment. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1104JUD001448008

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2010

4 novembre 2010

    The courts did not exclude the possibility that there were people living in Estonia who were receiving military pensions from a foreign country and, at the same time, a state pension from

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0329JUD000339403

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2010

29 mars 2010

    The applicants were represented by Mr P. Spinosi, of the Conseil d’Etat and Court of Cassation Bar. The French Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs E.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1021JUD004275009

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2013

21 octobre 2013

Such reductions were henceforth to be applied to each sentence individually.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0320JUD000457206

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2012

20 mars 2012

    The applicants were represented by Mr Serkan Cengiz and Ms Nalan Erkem, lawyers practising in İzmir. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0206JUD004861306

Admin. suprême

6 février 2014

6 février 2014

The judicial authorities were due to question twenty witnesses.

Source officielle